Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27570323›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Statistical Association2016

Constrained Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Model Calibration Using Summary-level Information from External Big Data Sources.

Nilanjan Chatterjee, Yi-Hau Chen, Paige Maas, Raymond J Carroll

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Improved risk prediction via cross-domain calibration in a retrospective case-control study.The Canadian journal of statistics = Revue canadienne de statistique · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Mediation with External Summary Statistic Information.Biostatistics (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. A Review of Methods for Research Synthesis.Statistics in medicine · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Robust angle-based transfer learning in high dimensions.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nilanjan ChatterjeeNational Cancer Institute, Rockville MD 20852, U.S.A.
Yi-Hau ChenInstitute of Statistical Science, Academia Sinica, Taipei 11529, Taiwan.
Paige MaasNational Cancer Institute, Rockville MD 20852, U.S.A.
Raymond J CarrollDepartment of Statistics, Texas A&M University, College Station TX 77843-3143, U.S.A., and Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Technology Sydney, PO Box 123, Broadway, NSW, 2007.

Funding

Methods for Epidemiology StudiesZIACP010181 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI ALBERT, PAUL · 2009 to 2025
$34.8M
Powerful Inference and Prediction for Genetic AssociationR01HL105397 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI PAN, WEI, SHEN, XIAOTONG TOM · 2011 to 2018
$2.9M
Measurement Error, Nutrition, Physical Activity and CancerU01CA057030 · NCI · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI CARROLL, RAYMOND J. · 2015 to 2019
$2.8M
Estimation and Inference of Gene Regulatory NetworksR01GM126002 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI PAN, WEI, SHEN, XIAOTONG TOM · 2017 to 2020
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA057030NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM126002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Information from various public and private data sources of extremely large sample sizes are now increasingly available for research purposes. Statistical methods are needed for utilizing information from such big data sources while analyzing data from individual studies that may collect more detailed information required for addressing specific hypotheses of interest. In this article, we consider the problem of building regression models based on individual-level data from an "internal" study while utilizing summary-level information, such as information on parameters for reduced models, from an "external" big data source. We identify a set of very general constraints that link internal and external models. These constraints are used to develop a framework for semiparametric maximum likelihood inference that allows the distribution of covariates to be estimated using either the internal sample or an external reference sample. We develop extensions for handling complex stratified sampling designs, such as case-control sampling, for the internal study. Asymptotic theory and variance estimators are developed for each case. We use simulation studies and a real data application to assess the performance of the proposed methods in contrast to the generalized regression (GR) calibration methodology that is popular in the sample survey literature.

Indexed as

Case-control studyEmpirical likelihoodGeneralized regression estimatorMisspecified modelProfile-likelihood

Identifiers

PMID27570323
PMCPMC4994914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.