Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27570248›Full record

ArticleThe Annals of applied biology2016

Triticum monococcum lines with distinct metabolic phenotypes and phloem-based partial resistance to the bird cherry-oat aphid Rhopalosiphum padi.

A F C Greenslade, J L Ward, J L Martin, D I Corol, S J Clark, L E Smart, G I Aradottir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Annals of applied biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Valorization of the essential oil fromFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Characterisation of bird cherry-oat aphid (The Annals of applied biology · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

A F C GreensladeDepartment of Biological Chemistry and Crop Protection Rothamsted Research Hertfordshire AL5 5JQ UK.
J L WardDepartment of Plant Biology and Crop Science Rothamsted Research Hertfordshire AL5 5JQ UK.
J L MartinDepartment of Biological Chemistry and Crop Protection Rothamsted Research Hertfordshire AL5 5JQ UK.
D I CorolDepartment of Plant Biology and Crop Science Rothamsted Research Hertfordshire AL5 5JQ UK.
S J ClarkDepartment of Computational and Systems Biology Rothamsted Research Hertfordshire AL5 2JQ UK.
L E SmartDepartment of Biological Chemistry and Crop Protection Rothamsted Research Hertfordshire AL5 5JQ UK.
G I AradottirDepartment of Biological Chemistry and Crop Protection Rothamsted Research Hertfordshire AL5 5JQ UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/C/00004559
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crop protection is an integral part of establishing food security, by protecting the yield potential of crops. Cereal aphids cause yield losses by direct damage and transmission of viruses. Some wild relatives of wheat show resistance to aphids but the mechanisms remain unresolved. In order to elucidate the location of the partial resistance to the bird cherry-oat aphid, Rhopalosiphum padi, in diploid wheat lines of Triticum monococcum, we conducted aphid performance studies using developmental bioassays and electrical penetration graphs, as well as metabolic profiling of partially resistant and susceptible lines. This demonstrated that the partial resistance is related to a delayed effect on the reproduction and development of R. padi. The observed partial resistance is phloem based and is shown by an increase in number of probes before the first phloem ingestion, a higher number and duration of salivation events without subsequent phloem feeding and a shorter time spent phloem feeding on plants with reduced susceptibility. Clear metabolic phenotypes separate partially resistant and susceptible lines, with the former having lower levels of the majority of primary metabolites, including total carbohydrates. A number of compounds were identified as being at different levels in the susceptible and partially resistant lines, with asparagine, octopamine and glycine betaine elevated in less susceptible lines without aphid infestation. In addition, two of those, asparagine and octopamine, as well as threonine, glutamine, succinate, trehalose, glycerol, guanosine and choline increased in response to infestation, accumulating in plant tissue localised close to aphid feeding after 24 h. There was no clear evidence of systemic plant response to aphid infestation.

Indexed as

Aphidcrop protectionEPGphloem feedingresistanceRhopalosiphum padiTriticum monococcumwheat

Identifiers

PMID27570248
PMCPMC4982108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.