Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27569920›Full record

ArticleTransplantation proceedings

Stability of Organ Donor Designations on Driver's Licenses.

N K R Sehgal, C Sullivan, M Figueroa, J A Pencak, J D Thornton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation proceedings. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

N K R SehgalUniversity School, Chagrin Falls, Ohio.
C SullivanCenter for Reducing Health Disparities, MetroHealth Campus of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
M FigueroaCenter for Reducing Health Disparities, MetroHealth Campus of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
J A PencakCenter for Reducing Health Disparities, MetroHealth Campus of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
J D ThorntonCenter for Reducing Health Disparities, MetroHealth Campus of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio; Department of Internal Medicine, MetroHealth Campus of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, MetroHealth Campus of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio. Electronic address: daryl.thornton@case.edu.

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of ClevelandUL1TR000439 · NCATS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KONSTAN, MICHAEL W. · 2012 to 2016
$50.0M
Transplant navigator interventuon to overcome barriers to kidney transplantionP60MD002265 · NIMHD · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI SEHGAL, ASHWINI · 2007 to 2016
$10.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000439NIMHD NIH HHS P60 MD002265
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle is known about the stability of decisions that people make to be organ donors. We sought to determine the rate of stability of organ donor designations on driver's licenses.

methodsWith the use of a cross-sectional study design, we reviewed the health records of 2500 randomly selected primary-care patients at a large urban safety-net medical system to obtain their demographic and medical characteristics. We also examined the two most recent unique driver's licenses, state identification cards, or learner's permits that were scanned into electronic health records as part of the patient registration process. We obtained organ donor designations from these documents for each patient.

resultsOf all patients, 1174 (47%) had two driver's licenses, identification cards, or permits in their electronic medical records. The two documents were issued an average of 3.5 years apart. Overall, 114 (10%) patients had differing organ donor designations on their two documents. Among the 502 patients who were designated as organ donors on the first document, 32 (6%) were not designated as organ donors on the second document. Among the 672 patients who were not designated as organ donors on the first document, 82 (12%) were designated as organ donors on the second document. There was little relationship between stability of organ donor designations and patient demographic and medical characteristics.

conclusionsAbout 1 of every 10 patients changed their organ donor designation, but stability was not associated with any demographic or medical factors. Further work is needed to understand why individuals change their organ donor designation.

Indexed as

Cross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleTissue and Organ ProcurementTissue Donors

Identifiers

PMID27569920
PMCPMC5546608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.