Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27569868›Full record

ArticleBiomaterials2016

The next-generation nicotine vaccine: a novel and potent hybrid nanoparticle-based nicotine vaccine.

Yun Hu, Daniel Smith, Evan Frazier, Reece Hoerle, Marion Ehrich, Chenming Zhang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomaterials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Smoking cessation and vaccination.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Immunoengineering has arrived.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yun HuDepartment of Biological Systems Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.
Daniel SmithDepartment of Biological Systems Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.
Evan FrazierDepartment of Biological Systems Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.
Reece HoerleDepartment of Biological Systems Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.
Marion EhrichDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Pathobiology, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.
Chenming ZhangDepartment of Biological Systems Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA. Electronic address: chzhang2@vt.edu.
Virginia Tech · US

Funding

Novel Nanovaccines Against Nicotine AddictionU01DA036850 · NIDA · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI ZHANG, CHENMING M · 2014 to 2016
$2.3M
Development of novel vaccines against drug abuse - Proof of concept study for vacR21DA030083 · NIDA · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI ZHANG, CHENMING M · 2011 to 2012
$385k
NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA030083NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA036850
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Owing to the urgent need for more effective treatment against nicotine addiction, a hybrid nanoparticle-based nicotine vaccine (NanoNiccine) was developed in this study. NanoNiccine was composed of a poly(lactide-co-glycolide) acid (PLGA) core, keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) as an adjuvant protein enclosed within the PLGA core, a lipid layer, and nicotine haptens conjugated to the outer surface of the lipid layer. In contrast to the traditional nicotine vaccine, NanoNiccine is not a nicotine-protein conjugate vaccine. Instead, the nicotine hapten and protein are separately located in the nanostructure to minimize antibody production towards KLH. The cellular uptake study demonstrated that NanoNiccine was ideal for internalization and processing by dendritic cells (DCs). Mice immunized with NanoNiccine produced much lower IgG level against KLH as compared to that immunized with the traditional nicotine-KLH (Nic-KLH) vaccine. In addition, NanoNiccine achieved up to a 400% higher titer of anti-nicotine IgG than the positive control, Nic-KLH. Additionally, the Th1/Th2 index of NanoNiccine suggested that the immune response induced by NanoNiccine was antibody response dominant. Furthermore, NanoNiccine was found to be safe in mice.

Indexed as

AnimalsDrug DesignFemaleHemocyaninsMiceMice, Inbred BALB CNanocapsulesNanoconjugatesNicotineVaccines, SyntheticHemocyaninskeyhole-limpet hemocyaninNanocapsulesNanoconjugatesNicotineVaccines, SyntheticAntibodyDendritic cellHybrid nanoparticleKLHNicotine vaccinePLGA

Identifiers

PMID27569868
PMCPMC5018466
OpenAlexW2516083370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.