Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27569593›Full record

ArticleGlobal health action

Tuberculosis screening in patients with HIV: use of audit and feedback to improve quality of care in Ghana.

Stephanie Bjerrum, Frank Bonsu, Nii Nortey Hanson-Nortey, Ernest Kenu, Isik Somuncu Johansen, Aase Bengaard Andersen, Lars Bjerrum, Dorte Jarbøl, Anders Munck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health action. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Roles and challenges of nurses in tuberculosis care in Africa: A narrative review.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. The in-hospital tuberculosis diagnostic cascade and early clinical outcomes among people living with HIV before and during the COVID-19 pandemic - a prospective multisite cohort study from Ghana.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Stephanie BjerrumDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Frank BonsuNational Tuberculosis Control Programme, Disease Control and Prevention Department, Ghana Health Services, Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana.
Nii Nortey Hanson-NorteyNational Tuberculosis Control Programme, Disease Control and Prevention Department, Ghana Health Services, Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana.
Ernest KenuDepartment of Medicine-Fevers Unit, Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana.
Isik Somuncu JohansenDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Aase Bengaard AndersenInstitute of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Lars BjerrumDepartment of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Dorte JarbølDepartment of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Anders MunckDepartment of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTuberculosis screening of people living with HIV (PLHIV) can contribute to early tuberculosis diagnosis and improved patient outcomes. Evidence-based guidelines for tuberculosis screening are available, but literature assessing their implementation and the quality of clinical practice is scarce.

objectivesTo assess tuberculosis screening practices and the effectiveness of audit and performance feedback to improve quality of tuberculosis screening at HIV care clinics in Ghana.

designHealthcare providers at 10 large HIV care clinics prospectively registered patient consultations during May and October 2014, before and after a performance feedback intervention in August 2014. The outcomes of interest were overall tuberculosis suspicion rate during consultations and provider adherence to the International Standards for Tuberculosis Care and the World Health Organizations' guidelines for symptom-based tuberculosis screening among PLHIV.

resultsTwenty-one healthcare providers registered a total of 2,666 consultations; 1,368 consultations before and 1,298 consultations after the feedback intervention. Tuberculosis suspicion rate during consultation increased from 12.6 to 20.9% after feedback (odds ratio, OR 1.83; 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.09-3.09). Before feedback, sputum smear microscopy was requested for 58.7% of patients with suspected tuberculosis, for 47.2% of patients with cough ≥2 weeks, and for 27.5% of patients with a positive World Health Organization (WHO) symptom screen (any of current cough, fever, weight loss or night sweats). After feedback, patients with a positive WHO symptom screen were more likely to be suspected of tuberculosis (OR 2.21; 95% CI: 1.19-4.09) and referred for microscopy (OR 2.71; 95% CI: 1.25-5.86).

conclusionsA simple prospective audit tool identified flaws in clinical practices for tuberculosis screening of PLHIV. There was no systematic identification of people with suspected active tuberculosis. We found low initial tuberculosis suspicion rate compounded by low referral rates of relevant patients for sputum smear microscopy. Adherence to recommended standards and guidelines for tuberculosis screening improved after performance feedback.

Indexed as

auditclinical practicefeedbackHIVquality of healthcarescreeningtuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID27569593
PMCPMC5002398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.