Trial reportThe Lancet. Oncology2016
Comparison of MAPIE versus MAP in patients with a poor response to preoperative chemotherapy for newly diagnosed high-grade osteosarcoma (EURAMOS-1): an open-label, international, randomised controlled trial.
Trial report in The Lancet. Oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 296 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Indentifying Epigenetic Biomarkers From Peripheral Blood of Osteosarcoma Patients Based on hMe-Seal Technique
Feasibility Study of Interval Compressed Regimen Using Four-drugs for Osteosarcoma
Multicenter Observational Study on the Treatment of Patients With Localized Osteosarcoma
Who cites it
296 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 517 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of regorafenib in the treatment of bone sarcomas: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2025Pooled it
- The efficacy of gemcitabine and docetaxel chemotherapy for the treatment of relapsed and refractory osteosarcoma: A systematic review and pre-clinical study.Cancer medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Biological Sample Collection to Advance Research and Treatment: A Fight Osteosarcoma Through European Research and Euro Ewing Consortium Statement.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024Guideline
- Evaluating the Outcome and Patient Safety of Methotrexate, Doxorubicin, and Cisplatin Regimen for Chemotherapy in Osteosarcoma: A Meta-Analysis.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Intercontinental collaboration in clinical trials for children and adolescents with cancer-A systematic review by ACCELERATE.Cancer medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Assessment of Risk of Bias in Osteosarcoma and Ewing's Sarcoma Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2021Pooled it
- Assessing Graded Histological Regression as Basis for Treatment Modification after Neoadjuvant Therapy in LAGC: An Exploratory Phase II Study.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Trial
- Methotrexate, Doxorubicin, and Cisplatin Versus Methotrexate, Doxorubicin, and Cisplatin + Ifosfamide in Poor Responders to Preoperative Chemotherapy for Newly Diagnosed High-Grade Osteosarcoma (JCOG0905): A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- A Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival of Osteosarcoma and Ewing's Sarcoma in Children: A SEER Database Analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2022Trial
- A pharmacologically-based approach to high dose methotrexate administration to investigate nephrotoxicity and acute kidney injury biomarkers in children and adolescents with newly diagnosed osteosarcoma.Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology · 2021Trial
- Minimal residual disease and relapse surveillance in osteosarcoma: an action-linked framework integrating liquid biopsy and imaging biomarkers.Journal of bone oncology · 2026Review
- Dysregulated AKT signaling reprograms osteosarcoma to drive selective reliance on EP300.The Journal of experimental medicine · 2026Article
- Osteosarcoma Across the Age Spectrum: Why Outcomes Diverge and Trials Must Adapt.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Genomic landscape and tumor immune microenvironment of osteosarcoma: Bridging mechanistic insights to precision therapeutics.Bone reports · 2026Review
- What's new in pediatric bone sarcomas and benign bone tumors.Journal of children's orthopaedics · 2026Article
236 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
53 authors at 20 institutions in 13 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe designed the EURAMOS-1 trial to investigate whether intensified postoperative chemotherapy for patients whose tumour showed a poor response to preoperative chemotherapy (≥10% viable tumour) improved event-free survival in patients with high-grade osteosarcoma.
methodsEURAMOS-1 was an open-label, international, phase 3 randomised, controlled trial. Consenting patients with newly diagnosed, resectable, high-grade osteosarcoma aged 40 years or younger were eligible for randomisation. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either postoperative cisplatin, doxorubicin, and methotrexate (MAP) or MAP plus ifosfamide and etoposide (MAPIE) using concealed permuted blocks with three stratification factors: trial group; location of tumour (proximal femur or proximal humerus vs other limb vs axial skeleton); and presence of metastases (no vs yes or possible). The MAP regimen consisted of cisplatin 120 mg/m
findingsBetween April 14, 2005, and June 30, 2011, 2260 patients were registered from 325 sites in 17 countries. 618 patients with poor response were randomly assigned; 310 to receive MAP and 308 to receive MAPIE. Median follow-up was 62·1 months (IQR 46·6-76·6); 62·3 months (IQR 46·9-77·1) for the MAP group and 61·1 months (IQR 46·5-75·3) for the MAPIE group. 307 event-free survival events were reported (153 in the MAP group vs 154 in the MAPIE group). 193 deaths were reported (101 in the MAP group vs 92 in the MAPIE group). Event-free survival did not differ between treatment groups (hazard ratio [HR] 0·98 [95% CI 0·78-1·23]); hazards were non-proportional (p=0·0003). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (268 [89%] patients in MAP vs 268 [90%] in MAPIE), thrombocytopenia (231 [78% in MAP vs 248 [83%] in MAPIE), and febrile neutropenia without documented infection (149 [50%] in MAP vs 217 [73%] in MAPIE). MAPIE was associated with more frequent grade 4 non-haematological toxicity than MAP (35 [12%] of 301 in the MAP group vs 71 [24%] of 298 in the MAPIE group). Two patients died during postoperative therapy, one from infection (although their absolute neutrophil count was normal), which was definitely related to their MAP treatment (specifically doxorubicin and cisplatin), and one from left ventricular systolic dysfunction, which was probably related to MAPIE treatment (specifically doxorubicin). One suspected unexpected serious adverse reaction was reported in the MAP group: bone marrow infarction due to methotrexate.
interpretationEURAMOS-1 results do not support the addition of ifosfamide and etoposide to postoperative chemotherapy in patients with poorly responding osteosarcoma because its administration was associated with increased toxicity without improving event-free survival. The results define standard of care for this population. New strategies are required to improve outcomes in this setting.
fundingUK Medical Research Council, National Cancer Institute, European Science Foundation, St Anna Kinderkrebsforschung, Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek-Vlaanderen, Parents Organization, Danish Medical Research Council, Academy of Finland, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Deutsche Krebshilfe, Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Semmelweis Foundation, ZonMw (Council for Medical Research), Research Council of Norway, Scandinavian Sarcoma Group, Swiss Paediatric Oncology Group, Cancer Research UK, National Institute for Health Research, University College London Hospitals, and Biomedical Research Centre.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.