Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27569275›Full record

ArticleClinical breast cancer2017

Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Breast Cancer With Leptomeningeal Metastasis.

Aki Morikawa, Lilly Jordan, Raquel Rozner, Sujata Patil, Adrienne Boire, Elena Pentsova, Andrew D Seidman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical breast cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Risk factors and clinical outcomes associated with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in gastric cancer.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Central Nervous System Metastases in Breast Cancer.Current treatment options in oncology · 2025
    Review
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aki MorikawaBreast Cancer Medicine Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Lilly JordanBreast Cancer Medicine Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Raquel RoznerBreast Cancer Medicine Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Sujata PatilDepartment of Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Adrienne BoireDepartment of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Elena PentsovaDepartment of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Andrew D SeidmanBreast Cancer Medicine Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY. Electronic address: seidmana@mskcc.org.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDisease presentation, prognostic factors, and treatment patterns for patients with breast cancer with leptomeningeal metastasis are not well characterized. In this study, we examined patient characteristics and prognostic factors for survival after a diagnosis of leptomeningeal metastasis. PATIENTS AND

methodsThree hundred eighteen consecutive patients with breast cancer diagnosed with leptomeningeal metastasis from January 1998 to December 2013 at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center were identified. Clinicopathologic and treatment information were obtained in a retrospective review. Associations with time from leptomeningeal diagnosis to death were evaluated according to Kaplan-Meier curves, log rank tests, and Cox proportional hazard models.

resultsOf the 318 patients, 44% were hormone receptor-positive (HR+) HER2

conclusionDespite the improvement noted with the more recent years of diagnosis, survival after a diagnosis of leptomeningeal metastasis remains poor. Similar to patients with parenchymal brain metastasis only, the survival differs among different receptor subtypes. A closer examination to identify factors, such as introduction of new systemic therapies that might contribute to longer-term survival might provide insight to improve management of these patients. In addition, factors we identified that are associated with survival might be considered as stratification variables in the design of future randomized clinical trials in this population.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImmunoenzyme TechniquesLymphatic MetastasisMeningeal NeoplasmsMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingBiomarkers, TumorERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneCentral nervous system metastasisLeptomeningeal diseaseMetastatic breast cancerPrognosisSurvival in patients with leptomeningeal metastases

Identifiers

PMID27569275
PMCPMC5266701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.