Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27568589›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2016

Cytology of DNA Replication Reveals Dynamic Plasticity of Large-Scale Chromatin Fibers.

Xiang Deng, Oxana A Zhironkina, Varvara D Cherepanynets, Olga S Strelkova, Igor I Kireev, Andrew S Belmont

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Mammalian DNA Replication Timing.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiang DengDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Oxana A ZhironkinaA.N. Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Moscow State University, Moscow 119991, Russia.
Varvara D CherepanynetsA.N. Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Moscow State University, Moscow 119991, Russia.
Olga S StrelkovaA.N. Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Moscow State University, Moscow 119991, Russia.
Igor I KireevA.N. Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Moscow State University, Moscow 119991, Russia. Electronic address: kireev@genebee.msu.ru.
Andrew S BelmontDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA. Electronic address: asbel@illinois.edu.
Lomonosov Moscow State University · RUUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

CHROMATIN DOMAIN STRUCTURE/FUNCTIONR01GM058460 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI BELMONT, ANDREW STEVEN · 1999 to 2025
$8.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM058460
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In higher eukaryotic interphase nuclei, the 100- to >1,000-fold linear compaction of chromatin is difficult to reconcile with its function as a template for transcription, replication, and repair. It is challenging to imagine how DNA and RNA polymerases with their associated molecular machinery would move along the DNA template without transient decondensation of observed large-scale chromatin "chromonema" fibers [1]. Transcription or "replication factory" models [2], in which polymerases remain fixed while DNA is reeled through, are similarly difficult to conceptualize without transient decondensation of these chromonema fibers. Here, we show how a dynamic plasticity of chromatin folding within large-scale chromatin fibers allows DNA replication to take place without significant changes in the global large-scale chromatin compaction or shape of these large-scale chromatin fibers. Time-lapse imaging of lac-operator-tagged chromosome regions shows no major change in the overall compaction of these chromosome regions during their DNA replication. Improved pulse-chase labeling of endogenous interphase chromosomes yields a model in which the global compaction and shape of large-Mbp chromatin domains remains largely invariant during DNA replication, with DNA within these domains undergoing significant movements and redistribution as they move into and then out of adjacent replication foci. In contrast to hierarchical folding models, this dynamic plasticity of large-scale chromatin organization explains how localized changes in DNA topology allow DNA replication to take place without an accompanying global unfolding of large-scale chromatin fibers while suggesting a possible mechanism for maintaining epigenetic programming of large-scale chromatin domains throughout DNA replication.

Indexed as

DNA ReplicationAnimalsCell LineCell NucleusCHO CellsChromatinCricetulusInterphaseTime-Lapse ImagingChromatin

Identifiers

PMID27568589
PMCPMC5039087
OpenAlexW2516778963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.