Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27568522›Full record

ArticleLeukemia2017

Treatment and outcome of 2904 CML patients from the EUTOS population-based registry.

V S Hoffmann, M Baccarani, J Hasford, F Castagnetti, F Di Raimondo, L F Casado, A Turkina, D Zackova, G Ossenkoppele, A Zaritskey and 23 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Leukemia, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The silent players: AtypicalOncology reports · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. [Survival of cancer patients in Navarre and comparison with Spain].Anales del sistema sanitario de Navarra · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors.

V S HoffmannInstitute for Medical Information Sciences, Biometry and Epidemiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, IBE, University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
M BaccaraniUniversity of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
J HasfordInstitute for Medical Information Sciences, Biometry and Epidemiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, IBE, University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
F CastagnettiInstitute of Hematology 'L & A Seragnoli', Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
F Di RaimondoDivision of Hematology, AOU Policlinico-OVE, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
L F CasadoServicio de Hematología, Hospital Virgen de la Salud, Toledo, Spain.
A TurkinaFederal State-Funded Institution 'National Research Center for Hematology' of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation.
D ZackovaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Brno and Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
G OssenkoppeleDepartment of Haematology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
A ZaritskeySt Petersburg State Medical University, St Petersburg, Russian Federation.
M HöglundUniversity of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden.
B SimonssonUniversity of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden.
K IndrakDepartment Hemato-oncology, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Z SninskaDepartment of Hematology, University Hospital, Bratislava, Slovakia.
T SachaKatedra i Klinika Hematologii UJCM, Kraków, Poland.
R ClarkRoyal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
A BogdanovicClinic of Hematology CCS and Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
A HellmannDepartment of Hematology and Transplantation, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
L GriskeviciusVilnius University Hospital Santariskiu Klinikos and Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
G Schubert-FritschleMunich Cancer Registry, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet, Munich, Germany.
D SerticDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
J GuilhotINSERM CIC 1402, CHU Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
S LejnieceRiga East Clinical University Hospital, Riga, Latvia.
I ZupanDepartment of Hematology, University Clinical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
S BurgstallerKlinikum Wells-Grieskirchen, Wells, Austria.
P KoskenvesaHelsinki University Central Hospital and Hematology Research Unit, Biomedicum Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
H EverausTartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia.
P CosteasThe Karaiskakio Foundation, Nicosia, Cyprus.
D LindoerferInstitute for Medical Information Sciences, Biometry and Epidemiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, IBE, University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
G RostiDepartment of Oncology and Hematology, Hematology Unit, St Orsola University Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
S SausseleIII. Medizinische Klinik, University of Heidelberg at Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
A HochhausAbteilung Hämatologie/Onkologie, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany.
R HehlmannIII. Medizinische Klinik, University of Heidelberg at Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The European Treatment and Outcome Study (EUTOS) population-based registry includes data of all adult patients newly diagnosed with Philadelphia chromosome-positive and/or BCR-ABL1+ chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in 20 predefined countries and regions of Europe. Registration time ranged from 12 to 60 months between January 2008 and December 2013. Median age was 55 years and median observation time was 29 months. Eighty percent of patients were treated first line with imatinib, and 17% with a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor, mostly according to European LeukemiaNet recommendations. After 12 months, complete cytogenetic remission (CCyR) and major molecular response (MMR) were achieved in 57% and 41% of patients, respectively. Patients with high EUTOS risk scores achieved CCyR and MMR significantly later than patients with low EUTOS risk. Probabilities of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival for all patients at 12, 24 and 30 months was 97%, 94% and 92%, and 95%, 92% and 90%, respectively. The new EUTOS long-term survival score was validated: the OS of patients differed significantly between the three risk groups. The probability of dying in remission was 1% after 24 months. The current management of patients with tyrosine kinase inhibitors resulted in responses and outcomes in the range reported from clinical trials. These data from a large population-based, patient sample provide a solid benchmark for the evaluation of new treatment policies.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsEuropeFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceLeukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL PositiveMaleMiddle AgedPopulation SurveillanceRegistriesSurvival Analysis

Identifiers

PMID27568522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.