Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27567926›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of colorectal disease2017

Laparoscopic lavage is superior to colon resection for perforated purulent diverticulitis-a meta-analysis.

Eva Angenete, David Bock, Jacob Rosenberg, Eva Haglind

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of colorectal disease, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03332550 completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

A National, Registry Based Study of Clinical Results After Emergency Operation for Perforated Diverticulitis to Compare Laparoscopic Lavage and Resection Surgery in Routine Use.

TypeobservationalSponsorSahlgrenska University HospitalRan2018 to 2022Enrolled669ConditionsPerforated DiverticulitisArmsLaparoscopic lavage, Colon resection
NCT04254224 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Scandinavian Diverticulitis Trial SCANDIV II: Treatment of Acute Complicated Diverticulitis: a Prospective Observational Study

TypeobservationalSponsorUppsala UniversityRan2018 to 2024Enrolled500ConditionsDiverticulitis ColonArmscolon resection, stoma
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Long-Term Results After Laparoscopic Lavage for Perforated Diverticulitis Purulent Peritonitis in Sweden: A Population-Based Observational Study.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2024
    Article
  8. Diverticulitis, surgery, evidence-based medicine, and the Steve Jobs' dots: a narrative review.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Review
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Long-term follow-up of a multicentre cohort study on laparoscopic peritoneal lavage for perforated diverticulitis.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2019
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Management of Diverticulitis in 2017.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Eva AngeneteDepartment of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, SSORG - Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, SE-416 85, Gothenburg, Sweden. eva.angenete@vgregion.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9966-4904
David BockDepartment of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, SSORG - Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, SE-416 85, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Jacob RosenbergDepartment of Surgery, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev Ringvej 75, DK-2730, Herlev, Denmark.
Eva HaglindDepartment of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, SSORG - Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, SE-416 85, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Sahlgrenska University Hospital · SEUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePerforated diverticulitis often requires surgery with a colon resection such as Hartmann's procedure, with inherent morbidity. Recent studies suggest that laparoscopic lavage may be an alternative surgical treatment. The aim of this study was to compare re-operations, morbidity, and mortality as well as health economic outcomes between laparoscopic lavage and colon resection for perforated purulent diverticulitis.

methodsPubMed, Cochrane, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, and Embase were searched. Published randomized controlled trials and prospective and retrospective cohorts with laparoscopic lavage and colon resection as interventions were identified. Trial limitations were assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Re-operations, complications at 90 days classified according to Clavien-Dindo and mortality were extracted.

resultsThree randomized trials published between 2005 and 2015 were included in the analysis. The studies included a total of 358 patients with 185 patients undergoing laparoscopic lavage. At 12 months, the relative risk of having a re-operation was lower for laparoscopic lavage compared to colon resection in the two trials that had a 12 month follow-up. We found no significant differences in Clavien-Dindo complications classified more than level IIIB or mortality at 90 days.

conclusionsThe risk for re-operations within the first 12 months after index surgery was lower for laparoscopic lavage compared to colon resection, with overall comparable morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, Hartmann's resection was more costly than laparoscopic lavage. We therefore consider laparoscopic lavage a valid alternative to surgery with resection for perforated purulent diverticulitis.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyPeritoneal LavageAgedColonDemographyDiverticulitisFemaleHumansIntestinal PerforationMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsReoperationDiverticulitisLaparoscopyMorbidity

Identifiers

PMID27567926
PMCPMC5285409
OpenAlexW2518476550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.