Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27567893›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2016

Determinants of institutional birth among women in rural Nepal: a mixed-methods cross-sectional study.

Sheela Maru, Sindhya Rajeev, Richa Pokhrel, Agya Poudyal, Pooja Mehta, Deepak Bista, Lynn Borgatta, Duncan Maru

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Sheela MaruBayalpata Hospital, Possible, Sanfebagar-10, Achham, Nepal. sheela@possiblehealth.org.
Sindhya RajeevBellevue Hospital Center, Ronald O. Perelman Department of Emergency Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Richa PokhrelCity of Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Agya PoudyalFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, Department of Biological and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Pooja MehtaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Deepak BistaBayalpata Hospital, Possible, Sanfebagar-10, Achham, Nepal.
Lynn BorgattaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Duncan MaruBayalpata Hospital, Possible, Sanfebagar-10, Achham, Nepal.
Boston University · USBerkeley City College · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USNew York University · USOxford Brookes University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEncouraging institutional birth is an important component of reducing maternal mortality in low-resource settings. This study aims to identify and understand the determinants of persistently low institutional birth in rural Nepal, with the goal of informing future interventions to reduce high rates of maternal mortality.

methodsPostpartum women giving birth in the catchment area population of a district-level hospital in the Far-Western Development Region of Nepal were invited to complete a cross-sectional survey in 2012 about their recent birth experience. Quantitative and qualitative methods were used to determine the institutional birth rate, social and demographic predictors of institutional birth, and barriers to institutional birth.

resultsThe institutional birth rate for the hospital's catchment area population was calculated to be 0.30 (54 home births, 23 facility births). Institutional birth was more likely as age decreased (ORs in the range of 0.20-0.28) and as income increased (ORs in the range of 1.38-1.45). Institutional birth among women who owned land was less likely (OR = 0.82 [0.71, 0.92]). Ninety percent of participants in the institutional birth group identified safety and good care as the most important factors determining location of birth, whereas 60 % of participants in the home birth group reported distance from hospital as a key determinant of location of birth. Qualitative analysis elucidated the importance of social support, financial resources, birth planning, awareness of services, perception of safety, and referral capacity in achieving an institutional birth.

conclusionAge, income, and land ownership, but not patient preference, were key predictors of institutional birth. Most women believed that birth at the hospital was safer regardless of where they gave birth. Future interventions to increase rates of institutional birth should address structural barriers including differences in socioeconomic status, social support, transportation resources, and birth preparedness.

Indexed as

AdultAge FactorsCatchment Area, HealthCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHealth FacilitiesHealth Services AccessibilityHome ChildbirthHumansMaternal Health ServicesNepalPatient Acceptance of Health CarePregnancyRural PopulationSocioeconomic FactorsGlobal healthImplementation researchInstitutional birth rateMaternal mortalityNepalSkilled birth attendantsWomen’s health

Identifiers

PMID27567893
PMCPMC5002328
OpenAlexW2508104297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.