Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27567892›Full record

Observational studyBMC family practice2016

Community health center provider ability to identify, treat and account for the social determinants of health: a card study.

Joy H Lewis, Kate Whelihan, Isaac Navarro, Kimberly R Boyle, SDH Card Study Implementation Team

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC family practice, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Concept Analysis and Proposed Definition ofJournal of primary care & community health
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Athletic Trainers' Perceptions of and Experience with Social Determinants of Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joy H LewisA.T. Still University of Health Sciences School of Osteopathic Medicine in Arizona (ATSU SOMA), 5850 E. Still Circle, Mesa, AZ, 85206, USA. JHLewis@atsu.edu.
Kate WhelihanA.T. Still University of Health Sciences School of Osteopathic Medicine in Arizona (ATSU SOMA), 5850 E. Still Circle, Mesa, AZ, 85206, USA.
Isaac NavarroA.T. Still University of Health Sciences School of Osteopathic Medicine in Arizona (ATSU SOMA), 5850 E. Still Circle, Mesa, AZ, 85206, USA.
Kimberly R BoyleKRB Clinical Solutions LLC, 24 Underwood Road, Montville, NJ, 07045, USA.
SDH Card Study Implementation Team

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe social determinants of health (SDH) are conditions that shape the overall health of an individual on a continuous basis. As momentum for addressing social factors in primary care settings grows, provider ability to identify, treat and assess these factors remains unknown. Community health centers care for over 20-million of America's highest risk populations. This study at three centers evaluates provider ability to identify, treat and code for the SDH.

methodsInvestigators utilized a pre-study survey and a card study design to obtain evidence from the point of care. The survey assessed providers' perceptions of the SDH and their ability to address them. Then providers filled out one anonymous card per patient on four assigned days over a 4-week period, documenting social factors observed during encounters. The cards allowed providers to indicate if they were able to: provide counseling or other interventions, enter a diagnosis code and enter a billing code for identified factors.

resultsThe results of the survey indicate providers were familiar with the SDH and were comfortable identifying social factors at the point of care. A total of 747 cards were completed. 1584 factors were identified and 31 % were reported as having a service provided. However, only 1.2 % of factors were associated with a billing code and 6.8 % received a diagnosis code.

conclusionsAn obvious discrepancy exists between the number of identifiable social factors, provider ability to address them and documentation with billing and diagnosis codes. This disparity could be related to provider inability to code for social factors and bill for related time and services. Health care organizations should seek to implement procedures to document and monitor social factors and actions taken to address them. Results of this study suggest simple methods of identification may be sufficient. The addition of searchable codes and reimbursements may improve the way social factors are addressed for individuals and populations.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCaliforniaClinical CompetenceCommunity Health CentersCounselingHumansIllinoisInternational Classification of DiseasesNew YorkPrimary Health CareRural Health ServicesSelf EfficacySocial Determinants of HealthSurveys and QuestionnairesUrban Health ServicesCommunity Health CentersDiagnosis codesElectronic Health RecordHealth care providersICD-10Primary careProcedure codesSocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID27567892
PMCPMC5002327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.