Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27567833›Full record

ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2016

Validation of Immunoassay-Based Tools for the Comprehensive Quantification of Aβ40 and Aβ42 Peptides in Plasma.

Virginia Pérez-Grijalba, Noelia Fandos, Jesús Canudas, Daniel Insua, Diego Casabona, Ana M Lacosta, María Montañés, Pedro Pesini, Manuel Sarasa

Open access · hybridAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. ADNI Biomarker Core: A review of progress since 2004 and future challenges.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Review
  5. A Multichannel Fluorescent Tongue for Amyloid-International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease.Advances in laboratory medicine · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Total AβNeurology · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Virginia Pérez-Grijalba
Noelia Fandos
Jesús Canudas
Daniel Insua
Diego Casabona
Ana M Lacosta
María Montañés
Pedro Pesini
Manuel Sarasa

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in neuroimaging and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker assays have provided evidence of a long preclinical stage of Alzheimer's disease (AD). This period is being increasingly targeted for secondary prevention trials of new therapies. In this context, the interest of a noninvasive, cost-effective amyloid-β (Aβ) blood-based test does not need to be overstated. Nevertheless, a thorough validation of these bioanalytical methods should be performed as a prerequisite for confident interpretation of clinical results. The aim of this study was to validate ELISA sandwich colorimetric ABtest40 and ABtest42 for the quantification of Aβ40 and Aβ42 in human plasma. The validation parameters assessed included precision, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, recovery, and dilution linearity. ABtest40 and ABtest42 proved to be specific for their target peptide using Aβ peptides with sequence similar to the target. Mean relative error in the quantification was found to be below 7.5% for both assays, with high intra-assay, inter-assay, and inter-batch precision (CV <9.0% on average). Sensitivity was assessed by determination of the limit of quantification fulfilling precision and accuracy criteria; it was established at 7.60 pg/ml and 3.60 pg/ml for ABtest40 and ABtest42, respectively. Plasma dilution linearity was demonstrated in PBS; however, dilution in a proprietary formulated buffer significantly increased the recovery of both Aβ40 and Aβ42 masked by matrix interactions, allowing a more comprehensive assessment of the free and total peptide levels in the plasma. In conclusion, both assays were successfully validated as tools for the quantification Aβ40 and Aβ42 in plasma.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAmyloid beta-PeptidesHumansImmunoassayLimit of DetectionPeptide FragmentsSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationAmyloid beta-Peptidesamyloid beta-protein (1-40)amyloid beta-protein (1-42)Peptide FragmentsAlzheimer’s diseaseamyloid-β peptidebiomarkerimmunoassay validationplasma

Identifiers

PMID27567833
PMCPMC5044780
OpenAlexW2517846941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.