Trial reportJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2016
A Phase II Study of Fornix Deep Brain Stimulation in Mild Alzheimer's Disease.
Trial report in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 147 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Twelve Month Double-blind Randomized Controlled Feasibility Study to Evaluate the Safety, Efficacy and Tolerability of Deep Brain Stimulation of the Fornix (DBS-f) in Patients With Mild Probable Alzheimer's Disease
Deep Brain Stimulation of the Fornix in Alzheimer's Disease: Investigations Into Clinical and Imaging Biomarkers and Dose Optimization
Who cites it
147 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 327 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep brain stimulation of the fornix for Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cognitive outcomes.Neurosurgical review · 2026Pooled it
- An updated overview of recent and ongoing deep brain stimulation (DBS) trials in patients with dementia: a systematic review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023Pooled it
- Connectomic neuromodulation for Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of invasive and non-invasive techniques.Translational psychiatry · 2022Pooled it
- Cellular, molecular, and clinical mechanisms of action of deep brain stimulation-a systematic review on established indications and outlook on future developments.EMBO molecular medicine · 2019Pooled it
- Fornix Mediates Information Propagation in Brain Networks Following DLPFC-Targeted rTMS in Alzheimer's Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2025Trial
- Mapping autonomic, mood and cognitive effects of hypothalamic region deep brain stimulation.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2021Trial
- Nucleus Basalis of Meynert Stimulation for Lewy Body Dementia: A Phase I Randomized Clinical Trial.Neurology · 2021Trial
- Effect of Age on Clinical Trial Outcome in Participants with Probable Alzheimer's Disease.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2021Trial
- A randomized, controlled clinical trial of plasma exchange with albumin replacement for Alzheimer's disease: Primary results of the AMBAR Study.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2020Trial
- Fornix-Region Deep Brain Stimulation-Induced Memory Flashbacks in Alzheimer's Disease.The New England journal of medicine · 2019Trial
- Cingulum stimulation enhances positive affect and anxiolysis to facilitate awake craniotomy.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2019Trial
- A Clinical Trial of Transcranial Electromagnetic Treatment in Alzheimer's Disease: Cognitive Enhancement and Associated Changes in Cerebrospinal Fluid, Blood, and Brain Imaging.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2019Trial
- Bilateral Deep Brain Stimulation of the Nucleus Basalis of Meynert for Parkinson Disease Dementia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA neurology · 2018Trial
- Integrating neural decoding, memristive materials, and adaptive control frameworks for next-generation hippocampal memory prosthetics.iScience · 2026Review
- Neuromodulation techniques targeting neurotransmitter dysfunction: Innovation in treatments for Alzheimer's disease.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Deep brain stimulation of the nucleus basalis of Meynert in neurodegenerative diseases with cognitive impairment: An update on evidence and mechanisms.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Deep cervical lymphovenous reconstruction in Alzheimer's disease: three target-defined interfaces with distinct mechanistic implications.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Review
- Neuromodulation of Working Memory: Mechanisms, Targets, and Behavioral Outcomes.Neuroscience insights · 2026Review
- Multitarget neurostimulation of the deep brain: clinical opportunities, challenges, and emerging technologies.Journal of neural engineering · 2025Review
- From adaptive deep brain stimulation to adaptive circuit targeting.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2025Review
87 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors at 14 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDeep brain stimulation (DBS) is used to modulate the activity of dysfunctional brain circuits. The safety and efficacy of DBS in dementia is unknown.
objectiveTo assess DBS of memory circuits as a treatment for patients with mild Alzheimer's disease (AD).
methodsWe evaluated active "on" versus sham "off" bilateral DBS directed at the fornix-a major fiber bundle in the brain's memory circuit-in a randomized, double-blind trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01608061) in 42 patients with mild AD. We measured cognitive function and cerebral glucose metabolism up to 12 months post-implantation.
resultsSurgery and electrical stimulation were safe and well tolerated. There were no significant differences in the primary cognitive outcomes (ADAS-Cog 13, CDR-SB) in the "on" versus "off" stimulation group at 12 months for the whole cohort. Patients receiving stimulation showed increased metabolism at 6 months but this was not significant at 12 months. On post-hoc analysis, there was a significant interaction between age and treatment outcome: in contrast to patients <65 years old (n = 12) whose results trended toward being worse with DBS ON versus OFF, in patients≥65 (n = 30) DBS-f ON treatment was associated with a trend toward both benefit on clinical outcomes and a greater increase in cerebral glucose metabolism.
conclusionDBS for AD was safe and associated with increased cerebral glucose metabolism. There were no differences in cognitive outcomes for participants as a whole, but participants aged≥65 years may have derived benefit while there was possible worsening in patients below age 65 years with stimulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.