Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27567641›Full record

SynthesisBMC neurology2016

The value of magnetic resonance imaging as a biomarker for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review.

G Grolez, C Moreau, V Danel-Brunaud, C Delmaire, R Lopes, P F Pradat, M M El Mendili, L Defebvre, D Devos

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC neurology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06491732 (Electrical Impedance Myography Via the Myolex mScan as an ALS Biomarker), which is not on this map. Cited by 43 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06491732 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Electrical Impedance Myography Via the Myolex mScan as an ALS Biomarker

TypeobservationalSponsorBeth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterRan2025 to 2027Enrolled80ConditionsAmyotrophic Lateral SclerosisArmsElectrical Impedance Myography
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Cerebral metabolic patterns onEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Diagnostics of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Up to Date.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

G GrolezDepartment of Movement Disorders and Neurology, Lille University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lille, Lille, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1291-8703
C MoreauDepartment of Movement Disorders and Neurology, Lille University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lille, Lille, France.
V Danel-BrunaudDepartment of Movement Disorders and Neurology, Lille University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lille, Lille, France.
C DelmaireINSERM U1171, Lille University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lille, Lille, France.
R LopesINSERM U1171, Lille University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lille, Lille, France.
P F PradatLaboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, CNRS, INSERM, Paris, France.
M M El MendiliLaboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, CNRS, INSERM, Paris, France.
L DefebvreDepartment of Movement Disorders and Neurology, Lille University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lille, Lille, France.
D DevosDepartment of Movement Disorders and Neurology, Lille University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lille, Lille, France. david.devos@chru-lille.fr.
Inserm · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal, rapidly progressive neurodegenerative disease that mainly affects the motor system. A number of potentially neuroprotective and neurorestorative disease-modifying drugs are currently in clinical development. At present, the evaluation of a drug's clinical efficacy in ALS is based on the ALS Functional Rating Scale Revised, motor tests and survival. However, these endpoints are general, variable and late-stage measures of the ALS disease process and thus require the long-term assessment of large cohorts. Hence, there is a need for more sensitive radiological biomarkers. Various sequences for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain and spinal cord have may have value as surrogate biomarkers for use in future clinical trials. Here, we review the MRI findings in ALS, their clinical correlations, and their limitations and potential role as biomarkers.

methodsThe PubMed database was screened to identify studies using MRI in ALS. We included general MRI studies with a control group and an ALS group and longitudinal studies even if a control group was lacking.

resultsA total of 116 studies were analysed with MRI data and clinical correlations. The most disease-sensitive MRI patterns are in motor regions but the brain is more broadly affected.

conclusionDespite the existing MRI biomarkers, there is a need for large cohorts with long term MRI and clinical follow-up. MRI assessment could be improved by standardized MRI protocols with multicentre studies.

Indexed as

BiomarkersAmyotrophic Lateral SclerosisClinical Trials as TopicHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingBiomarkersAmyotrophic lateral sclerosisBiomarkersDiffusion tensor imagingMagnetic resonance imagingMagnetic resonance spectroscopyMorphometrySpinal cord

Identifiers

PMID27567641
PMCPMC5002331
OpenAlexW2509849114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.