Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27567532›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular biology2016

Structural Conservation and E2F Binding Specificity within the Retinoblastoma Pocket Protein Family.

Tyler J Liban, Michael J Thwaites, Frederick A Dick, Seth M Rubin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Chromatin association promotes UBR5-mediated degradation of Rb.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. The E2F family: a ray of dawn in cardiomyopathy.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2025
    Review
  4. Current issues in molecular biology · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Cancer research · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The broken cycle: E2F dysfunction in cancer.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Conservation and divergence of C-terminal domain structure in the retinoblastoma protein family.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tyler J LibanDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA.
Michael J ThwaitesDepartment of Biochemistry, Western University, London Regional Cancer Program and Children's Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada.
Frederick A DickDepartment of Biochemistry, Western University, London Regional Cancer Program and Children's Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada.
Seth M RubinDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA. Electronic address: srubin@ucsc.edu.
University of California, Santa Cruz · USWestern University · CA

Funding

Molecular Mechanisms Regulating the Retinoblastoma Protein FamilyR01CA132685 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ · PI RUBIN, SETH MICHAEL · 2008 to 2017
$3.0M
CIHR MOP-89765NCI NIH HHS R01 CA132685
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human pocket proteins retinoblastoma (Rb), p107, and p130 are critical negative regulators of the cell cycle and contribute to tumor suppression. While strong structural conservation within the pocket protein family provides for some functional redundancy, important differences have been observed and may underlie the reason that Rb is a uniquely potent tumor suppressor. It has been proposed that distinct pocket protein activities are mediated by their different E2F transcription factor binding partners. In humans, Rb binds E2F1-E2F5, whereas p107 and p130 almost exclusively associate with E2F4 and E2F5. To identify the molecular determinants of this specificity, we compared the crystal structures of Rb and p107 pocket domains and identified several key residues that contribute to E2F selectivity in the pocket family. Mutation of these residues in p107 to match the analogous residue in Rb results in an increase in affinity for E2F1 and E2F2 and an increase in the ability of p107 to inhibit E2F2 transactivation. Additionally, we investigated how phosphorylation by Cyclin-dependent kinase on distinct residues regulates p107 affinity for the E2F4 transactivation domain. We found that phosphorylation of residues S650 and S975 weakens the E2F4 transactivation domain binding. Our data reveal molecular features of pocket proteins that are responsible for their similarities and differences in function and regulation.

Indexed as

Crystallography, X-RayDNA Mutational AnalysisE2F1 Transcription FactorE2F4 Transcription FactorE2F5 Transcription FactorHumansMutant ProteinsPhosphorylationProtein BindingProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalRetinoblastoma-Like Protein p107Retinoblastoma ProteinSubstrate SpecificityE2F1 protein, humanE2F1 Transcription FactorE2F4 protein, humanE2F4 Transcription FactorE2F5 protein, humanE2F5 Transcription FactorMutant ProteinsRBL1 protein, humanRetinoblastoma-Like Protein p107Retinoblastoma Proteincell cycle regulationisothermal titration calorimetryprotein phosphorylationprotein–protein interactionstranscription factors

Identifiers

PMID27567532
PMCPMC5048593
OpenAlexW2516004499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.