Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27567261›Full record

ArticleDNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes2017

Draft genome sequence of Cicer reticulatum L., the wild progenitor of chickpea provides a resource for agronomic trait improvement.

Sonal Gupta, Kashif Nawaz, Sabiha Parween, Riti Roy, Kamlesh Sahu, Anil Kumar Pole, Hitaishi Khandal, Rishi Srivastava, Swarup Kumar Parida, Debasis Chattopadhyay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. A genome-wide association analysis identifies a key candidate gene controlling plant growth habit in chickpea.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  4. Identification and characterization of theFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Uncovering DNA methylation landscapes to decipher evolutionary footprints of phenotypic diversity in chickpea.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Evaluation of Total Isoflavones in Chickpea (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. CicerSpTEdb2.0: An Upgrade of Cicer Species Transposable Elements Database.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. A Comprehensive Review on Chickpea (International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sonal GuptaNational Institute of Plant Genome Research, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi 110067, India.
Kashif NawazNational Institute of Plant Genome Research, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi 110067, India.
Sabiha Parween
Riti Roy
Kamlesh Sahu
Anil Kumar Pole
Hitaishi Khandal
Rishi Srivastava
Swarup Kumar Parida
Debasis Chattopadhyay

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cicer reticulatum L. is the wild progenitor of the fourth most important legume crop chickpea (C. arietinum L.). We assembled short-read sequences into 416 Mb draft genome of C. reticulatum and anchored 78% (327 Mb) of this assembly to eight linkage groups. Genome annotation predicted 25,680 protein-coding genes covering more than 90% of predicted gene space. The genome assembly shared a substantial synteny and conservation of gene orders with the genome of the model legume Medicago truncatula. Resistance gene homologs of wild and domesticated chickpeas showed high sequence homology and conserved synteny. Comparison of gene sequences and nucleotide diversity using 66 wild and domesticated chickpea accessions suggested that the desi type chickpea was genetically closer to the wild species than the kabuli type. Comparative analyses predicted gene flow between the wild and the cultivated species during domestication. Molecular diversity and population genetic structure determination using 15,096 genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphisms revealed an admixed domestication pattern among cultivated (desi and kabuli) and wild chickpea accessions belonging to three population groups reflecting significant influence of parentage or geographical origin for their cultivar-specific population classification. The assembly and the polymorphic sequence resources presented here would facilitate the study of chickpea domestication and targeted use of wild Cicer germplasms for agronomic trait improvement in chickpea.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantSoilCicerPhylogenyPlant DiseasesPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSoilannotationCicer reticulatum L. PI489777diversitygenome sequencewild chickpea

Identifiers

PMID27567261
PMCPMC5381347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.