Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27567145›Full record

ArticleResearch in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP2017

Quality improvement practices to institutionalize supply chain best practices for iCCM: Evidence from Rwanda and Malawi.

Yasmin Chandani, Malia Duffy, Barbara Lamphere, Megan Noel, Alexis Heaton, Sarah Andersson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Supply-chain factors and antimicrobial stewardship.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yasmin ChandaniJSI Research & Training Institute, Inc., Ground Floor Acacia Building, Westlands Office Park, Westlands, Nairobi, Kenya. Electronic address: yasmin_chandani@jsi.com.
Malia DuffyJohn Snow, Inc. 44 Farnsworth Street, Boston, MA 02210-1211, USA.
Barbara LamphereJSI Research & Training Institute, Inc., 1616 Fort Myer Dr. Arlington, VA 22209, USA.
Megan NoelJSI Research & Training Institute, Inc., 1616 Fort Myer Dr. Arlington, VA 22209, USA.
Alexis HeatonJSI Research & Training Institute, Inc., 1616 Fort Myer Dr. Arlington, VA 22209, USA.
Sarah AnderssonJSI Research & Training Institute, Inc., 1616 Fort Myer Dr. Arlington, VA 22209, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSupply chain bottlenecks that prevent community health workers (CHWs) from accessing essential medicines significantly increase under-5 child mortality, particularly in poor and rural areas.

objectiveUsing implementation research, interventions aimed at improving supply chain practices and access to medicines were tested in Malawi and Rwanda. These interventions included simple demand-based resupply procedures, using mobile technology and traditional methods for communication, and multilevel, performance-driven quality improvement (QI) teams.

methodsMixed-method evaluations were conducted at baseline (2010), midline (2013), and endline (2014). Baseline assessments identified common bottlenecks and established performance levels. Midline assessments identified which intervention package had the greatest impact. Endline surveys measured the progress of scale-up and institutionalization of each innovation.

resultsIn both Rwanda and Malawi CHWs, health center staff, and district managers all cited many benefits of the establishment of resupply procedures and QI teams: such as providing structure and processes, a means to analyze and discuss problems and enhance collaboration between staff.

conclusionsImplementing simple, streamlined, demand-based resupply procedures formed the basis for informed and regular resupply, and increased the visibility of appropriate and timely community logistics data. QI teams played a critical role in reinforcing resupply procedures and routinely unlocking the bottlenecks that prevent the continuous flow of critical health products. While simple, streamlined, demand-based resupply procedures provide the basis for regular, functional, and efficient resupply of CHWs, the procedures alone are not sufficient to create consistent change in product availability. Supporting these procedures with multilevel QI teams reinforces the correct and consistent use of resupply procedures.

Indexed as

Quality ImprovementChildChild Health ServicesCommunity Health WorkersDrugs, EssentialHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMalawiPrescription DrugsRwandaDrugs, EssentialPrescription DrugsCommunity health workersIntegrated community case managementSupply chain management

Identifiers

PMID27567145
PMCPMC5704638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.