Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27566768›Full record

ArticleStatistical methods in medical research2016

Spatial Bayesian surveillance for small area case event data.

Chawarat Rotejanaprasert, Andrew Lawson, Susan Bolick-Aldrich, Deborah Hurley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistical methods in medical research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chawarat RotejanaprasertDepartment of Public Health sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, USA chawarat.rot@biotec.or.th.
Andrew LawsonDepartment of Public Health sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, USA.
Susan Bolick-AldrichSouth Carolina Central Cancer Registry, South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, USA.
Deborah HurleySouth Carolina Central Cancer Registry, South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, USA.

Funding

Surveillance of Spatial Case Event Data in Cancer StudiesR03CA179665 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI LAWSON, ANDREW B. · 2014 to 2015
$146k
NCI NIH HHS R03 CA179665
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been little development of surveillance procedures for epidemiological data with fine spatial resolution such as case events at residential address locations. This is often due to difficulties of access when confidentiality of medical records is an issue. However, when such data are available, it is important to be able to affect an appropriate analysis strategy. We propose a model for point events in the context of prospective surveillance based on conditional logistic modeling. A weighted conditional autoregressive model is developed for irregular lattices to account for distance effects, and a Dirichlet tessellation is adopted to define the neighborhood structure. Localized clustering diagnostics are compared including the proposed local Kullback-Leibler information criterion. A simulation study is conducted to examine the surveillance and detection methods, and a data example is provided of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma data in South Carolina.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremEpidemiological MonitoringCluster AnalysisComputer SimulationHumansLogistic ModelsLymphoma, Non-HodgkinProspective StudiesROC CurveSouth CarolinaSpatio-Temporal AnalysisBayesiancase event dataKullback–Leiblerspatialsurveillance

Identifiers

PMID27566768
PMCPMC5389384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.