Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27566760›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2016

Evolutionary Dynamics of Chloroplast Genomes in Low Light: A Case Study of the Endolithic Green Alga Ostreobium quekettii.

Vanessa R Marcelino, Ma Chiela M Cremen, Chistopher J Jackson, Anthony A W Larkum, Heroen Verbruggen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Eukaryotic genomic data uncover an extensive host range of mirusviruses.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  5. Chloroplast genome structure analysis ofFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Reference datasets ofData in brief · 2017
    Article
  16. Does Cell Size Impact Chloroplast Genome Size?Frontiers in plant science · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vanessa R MarcelinoSchool of Biosciences, University of Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia vrmarcelino@gmail.com.
Ma Chiela M CremenSchool of Biosciences, University of Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia.
Chistopher J JacksonSchool of Biosciences, University of Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia.
Anthony A W LarkumPlant Functional Biology and Climate Change Cluster, University of Technology Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia.
Heroen VerbruggenSchool of Biosciences, University of Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia.
University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Technology Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Some photosynthetic organisms live in extremely low light environments. Light limitation is associated with selective forces as well as reduced exposure to mutagens, and over evolutionary timescales it can leave a footprint on species' genomes. Here, we present the chloroplast genomes of four green algae (Bryopsidales, Ulvophyceae), including the endolithic (limestone-boring) alga Ostreobium quekettii, which is a low light specialist. We use phylogenetic models and comparative genomic tools to investigate whether the chloroplast genome of Ostreobium corresponds to our expectations of how low light would affect genome evolution. Ostreobium has the smallest and most gene-dense chloroplast genome among Ulvophyceae reported to date, matching our expectation that light limitation would impose resource constraints reflected in the chloroplast genome architecture. Rates of molecular evolution are significantly slower along the phylogenetic branch leading to Ostreobium, in agreement with the expected effects of low light and energy levels on molecular evolution. We expected the ability of Ostreobium to perform photosynthesis in very low light to be associated with positive selection in genes related to the photosynthetic machinery, but instead, we observed that these genes may be under stronger purifying selection. Besides shedding light on the genome dynamics associated with a low light lifestyle, this study helps to resolve the role of environmental factors in shaping the diversity of genome architectures observed in nature.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenome, ChloroplastAdaptation, PhysiologicalChlorophytaPhotosynthesisPhylogenySelection, GeneticSunlightboring algaegenome streamliningphotosynthesisrates of evolutionstoichiogenomics

Identifiers

PMID27566760
PMCPMC5633697
OpenAlexW2514555320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.