ReviewCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2016
Practical Pharmacogenomic Approaches to Heart Failure Therapeutics.
Review in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Short-Term Therapies for Treatment of Acute and Advanced Heart Failure-Why so Few Drugs Available in Clinical Use, Why Even Fewer in the Pipeline?Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Review
- DPP-4 inhibitors and heart failure: a potential role for pharmacogenomics.Heart failure reviews · 2018Review
- Current Management and Future Directions of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: a Contemporary Review.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2018Review
- Big Data and Genome Editing Technology: A New Paradigm of Cardiovascular Genomics.Current cardiology reviews · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
opinion statementThe major challenge in applying pharmacogenomics to everyday clinical practice in heart failure (HF) is based on (1) a lack of robust clinical evidence for the differential utilization of neurohormonal antagonists in the management of HF in different subgroups, (2) inconsistent results regarding appropriate subgroups that may potentially benefit from an alternative strategy based on pharmacogenomic analyses, and (3) a lack of clinical trials that focused on testing gene-guided treatment in HF. To date, all pharmacogenomic analyses in HF have been conducted as post hoc retrospective analyses of clinical trial data or of observational patient series studies. This is in direct contrast with the guideline-directed HF therapies that have demonstrated their safety and efficacy in the absence of pharmacogenomic guidance. Therefore, the future of clinical applications of pharmacogenomic testing will largely depend on our ability to incorporate gene-drug interactions into the prescribing process, requiring that preemptive and cost-effective testing be paired with decision-support tools in a value-based care approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.