ReviewCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2016
Role of Imaging in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.
Review in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Learning Curve for Starting a Successful Single-Centre TAVR Programme with Multiple Devices: Early and Mid-Term Follow-Up.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Pre-procedural CT angiography inferior vena cava measurements: a predictor of mortality in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.European radiology · 2019Article
- Incidental Findings Diagnosed during Preprocedural Evaluation of TAVR.Cardiology research and practice · 2019Article
- The role of echocardiography and CT angiography in transcatheter aortic valve implantation patients.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2018Review
- Standard imaging techniques in transcatheter aortic valve replacement.Journal of thoracic disease · 2017Review
- Ferumoxytol MRA for transcatheter aortic valve replacement planning with renal insufficiency.International journal of cardiology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
opinion statementTranscatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has emerged as an effective treatment alternative in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) who are deemed surgically high-risk or ineligible for surgery. Pre-procedural imaging, in particular computed tomography (CT), plays an integral part in the planning and performance of TAVR and is crucial for a successful treatment. Novel technological advances in CT include high-pitch, low kV acquisitions, and iterative reconstruction resulting in high image quality at substantially reduced scan duration, contrast volume, and radiation exposure. Given the high spatial and temporal resolution of the acquisitions, CT angiography provides critical information on the eligibility for the peripheral vascular access, aortic root assessment, as well as the aortic annulus measurements, including the coronary ostia and concomitant cardiac pathology. Pre-procedural CT imaging is key for appropriate device size selection to minimize peri-procedural complications and optimize procedural success. In this article, we review the current state of imaging in the pre-interventional setting of TAVR with a special emphasis on CT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27566706What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.