Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27566650›Full record

ReviewDer Radiologe2016

[Clinical pathology of granulomatous inflammation : With special emphasis on the lungs and central nervous system].

C Tóth

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Radiologe, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Multidisciplinary Postoperative Validation ofJournal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Article
  2. [Smouldering fire].Der Radiologe · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

C TóthPathologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 224, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland. csaba.toth@med.uni-heidelberg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

clinical issueGranulomatous diseases are not rare in routine daily diagnostics. Granulomas are an indication of a sufficiently functioning immune system. In the absence of granulomas, a possible immunodeficiency should also be considered (e.g. in tuberculosis) in the diagnostic procedure. Many types of diseases with different etiologies can cause granulomatous manifestations. DIAGNOSTICS: Diagnostic procedures should be oriented to the clinical symptoms and should include blood analyses, radiography, especially computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and sampling for histology or cytology. In the case of proven granulomatous inflammation an infectious etiology should first be excluded. The diagnosis of a granulomatous disease should always be confirmed by histopathology when possible. ACHIEVEMENTS: In this study the origins and general histopathological classification of granulomatous diseases are presented. In addition to the most common granulomatous diseases, some special and rare forms are discussed, which should also be considered in the differential diagnostic process. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: The diagnosis of a granulomatous disease should always be made in an interdisciplinary cooperation and requires close collaboration between radiologists, internists, pathologists and specialists in laboratory parameters.

Indexed as

Clinical Laboratory TechniquesDiagnosis, DifferentialDiagnostic ImagingEncephalitisGranulomaHumansPneumoniaCentral nervous systemGranulomaHistopathologyImmune responseLungs

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.