Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27566645›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2016

Managers' use of nursing workforce planning and deployment technologies: protocol for a realist synthesis of implementation and impact.

Christopher Burton, Jo Rycroft-Malone, Lynne Williams, Siân Davies, Anne McBride, Beth Hall, Anne-M Rowlands, Adrian Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christopher BurtonNoreen Edwards Chair of Rehabilitation and Nursing Research, Head of School, School of Healthcare Sciences, Bangor University, Gwynedd, UK.
Jo Rycroft-MaloneBangor University, Bangor, UK.
Lynne WilliamsBangor University, Bangor, UK.
Siân DaviesBangor University, Bangor, UK.
Anne McBrideAlliance Manchester Business School, Manchester University, Manchester, UK.
Beth HallBangor University, Bangor, UK.
Anne-M RowlandsBetsi Cadwaladr Health Board, Bangor, UK.
Adrian JonesBetsi Cadwaladr Health Board, Bangor, UK.

Funding

Department of Health HS&DR/14/194/20
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNursing staffing levels in hospitals appear to be associated with improved patient outcomes. National guidance indicates that the triangulation of information from workforce planning and deployment technologies (WPTs; eg, the Safer Nursing Care Tool) and 'local knowledge' is important for managers to achieve appropriate staffing levels for better patient outcomes. Although WPTs provide managers with predictive information about future staffing requirements, ensuring patient safety and quality care also requires the consideration of information from other sources in real time. Yet little attention has been given to how to support managers to implement WPTs in practice. Given this lack of understanding, this evidence synthesis is designed to address the research question: managers' use of WPTs and their impacts on nurse staffing and patient care: what works, for whom, how and in what circumstances? METHODS AND ANALYSIS: To explain how WPTs may work and in what contexts, we will conduct a realist evidence synthesis through sourcing relevant evidence, and consulting with stakeholders about the impacts of WPTs on health and relevant public service fields. The review will be in 4 phases over 18 months. Phase 1: we will construct an initial theoretical framework that provides plausible explanations of what works about WPTs. Phase 2: evidence retrieval, review and synthesis guided by the theoretical framework; phase 3: testing and refining of programme theories, to determine their relevance; phase 4: formulating actionable recommendations about how WPTs should be implemented in clinical practice. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been gained from the study's institutional sponsors. Ethical review from the National Health Service (NHS) is not required; however research and development permissions will be obtained. Findings will be disseminated through stakeholder engagement and knowledge mobilisation activities. The synthesis will develop an explanatory programme theory of the implementation and impact of nursing WPTs, and practical guidance for nurse managers. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42016038132.

Indexed as

HumansNursing Staff, HospitalPatient Care PlanningPatient SafetyPlanning TechniquesPrimary Care NursingResearch DesignUnited KingdomdeploymentmanagersNursingsafe staffingtechnologiesworkforce planning

Identifiers

PMID27566645
PMCPMC5013355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.