Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27566636›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2016

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials on the effects of potassium supplements on serum potassium and creatinine.

Francesco P Cappuccio, Laura A Buchanan, Chen Ji, Alfonso Siani, Michelle A Miller

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Potassium and the kidney.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Francesco P CappuccioDivision of Health Sciences (Mental Health & Wellbeing), University of Warwick, WHO Collaborating Centre for Nutrition, Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK.
Laura A BuchananDivision of Health Sciences (Mental Health & Wellbeing), University of Warwick, WHO Collaborating Centre for Nutrition, Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK.
Chen JiDivision of Health Sciences (Mental Health & Wellbeing), University of Warwick, WHO Collaborating Centre for Nutrition, Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK.
Alfonso SianiInstitute of Food Sciences, National Research Council, Avellino, Italy.
Michelle A MillerDivision of Health Sciences (Mental Health & Wellbeing), University of Warwick, WHO Collaborating Centre for Nutrition, Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK.
University of Warwick · GBNational Research Council · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesHigh potassium intake could prevent stroke, but supplementation is considered hazardous. We assessed the effect of oral potassium supplementation on serum or plasma potassium levels and renal function.

settingWe updated a systematic review of the effects of potassium supplementation in randomised clinical trials carried out worldwide, published in 2013, extending it to July 2015. We followed the PRISMA guidelines.

participantsAny individual taking part in a potassium supplementation randomised clinical trial. Studies included met the following criteria: randomised clinical trials, potassium supplement given and circulating potassium levels reported.

interventionOral potassium supplementation. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Serum or plasma potassium and serum or plasma creatinine.

resultsA total of 20 trials (21 independent groups) were included (1216 participants from 12 different countries). All but 2 were controlled (placebo n=16, control n=2). Of these trials, 15 were crossover, 4 had a parallel group and 1 was sequential. The duration of supplementation varied from 2 to 24 weeks and the amount of potassium given from 22 to 140 mmol/day. In the pooled analysis, potassium supplementation caused a small but significant increase in circulating potassium levels (weighted mean difference (WMD) 0.14 mmol/L, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.19, p<1×10(-5)), not associated with dose or duration of treatment. The average increase in urinary potassium excretion was 45.75 mmol/24 hours, 95% CI 38.81 to 53.69, p<1×10(-5). Potassium supplementation did not cause any change in circulating creatinine levels (WMD 0.30 µmol/L, 95% CI -1.19 to 1.78, p=0.70).

conclusionsIn short-term studies of relatively healthy persons, a moderate oral potassium supplement resulted in a small increase in circulating potassium levels and no change in renal function.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsCreatinineHumansPotassiumRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStrokeCreatininePotassiummeta-analysispotassium supplementsrandomized clinical trialssafetyserum potassiumsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID27566636
PMCPMC5013341
OpenAlexW2467710456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.