Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27566627›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2016

Internet-based self-management support for adults with asthma: a qualitative study among patients, general practitioners and practice nurses on barriers to implementation.

Johanna L van Gaalen, Leti van Bodegom-Vos, Moira J Bakker, Jiska B Snoeck-Stroband, Jacob K Sont

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Implementation of Coach McLungsBMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Patient and provider perspectives on uptake of a shared decision making intervention for asthma in primary care practices.The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Johanna L van GaalenDepartment of Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Leti van Bodegom-VosDepartment of Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Moira J BakkerDepartment of Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jiska B Snoeck-StrobandDepartment of Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jacob K SontDepartment of Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to explore barriers among patients, general practitioners (GPs) and practice nurses to implement internet-based self-management support as provided by PatientCoach for asthma in primary care.

settingPrimary care within South Holland, the Netherlands.

participantsTwenty-two patients (12 women, mean age 38 years), 21 GPs (6 women, mean age 52 years) and 13 practice nurses (all women, mean age 41 years).

designA qualitative study using focus groups and interviews. OUTCOMES: Barriers as perceived by patients, GPs and practice nurses to implementation of PatientCoach.

methods10 focus groups and 12 interviews were held to collect data: 4 patient focus groups, 4 GP focus groups, 2 practice nurse focus group, 2 patient interviews, 5 GP interviews and 5 practice nurse interviews. A prototype of PatientCoach that included modules for coaching, personalised information, asthma self-monitoring, medication treatment plan, feedback, e-consultations and a forum was demonstrated. A semistructured topic guide was used. Directed content analysis was used to analyse data. Reported barriers were classified according to a framework by Grol and Wensing.

resultsA variety of barriers emerged among all participant groups. Barriers identified among patients include a lack of a patient-professional partnership in using PatientCoach and a lack of perceived benefit in improving asthma symptoms. Barriers identified among GPs include a low sense of urgency towards asthma care and current work routines. Practice nurses identified a low level of structured asthma care and a lack of support by colleagues as barriers. Among all participant groups, insufficient ease of use of PatientCoach, lack of financial arrangements and patient characteristics such as a lack of asthma symptoms were reported as barriers.

conclusionsWe identified a variety of barriers to implementation of PatientCoach. An effective implementation strategy for internet-based self-management support in asthma care should focus on these barriers.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelInternetAdultAsthmaFemaleFocus GroupsGeneral PractitionersHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsNursesPhysician-Patient RelationsPrimary Health CareQualitative Researchehealthimplementationmedical informaticsPRIMARY CARE

Identifiers

PMID27566627
PMCPMC5013403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.