Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27566615›Full record

ReviewNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2017

Study of the anti-seizure effects of low-frequency stimulation following kindling (a review of the cellular mechanism related to the anti-seizure effects of low-frequency electrical stimulation).

Zohreh Ghotbeddin, Mahyar Janahmadi, Ali Yadollahpour

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Zohreh GhotbeddinDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran. ghotbeddiny2010@gmail.com.
Mahyar JanahmadiNeuroscience Research Center, Medical School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Evin, Tehran, Iran.
Ali YadollahpourDepartment of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences · IRShahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IRShahid Chamran University of Ahvaz · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epilepsy affects about 1-2 % of world population as a chronic neurological disease that is manifested by repeated and consecutive seizures (Grone and Baraban, Nat Neurosci 18(3):339-343, 2015). There is no definitive therapy for epilepsy and antiepileptic drugs cannot offer a permanent and definitive cure for epilepsy, and most epileptic patients become drug resistant (Sasa, J Pharmacol Sci 100(5):487-494, 2006). Surgery and removal of the epileptic focus is a substitute method for treating drug-resistant patients and epilepsy surgery of either side of the brain improves seizure control. Temporal lobectomy is the most common epilepsy surgery and is associated with high success rates. Other studies have reported higher success rates for carefully selected temporal lobe seizure patients. Some physicians still consider temporal lobectomy an extreme procedure, citing the risks of side effects, including loss of memory, visual disturbances, and emotional change, associated with the removal of brain tissue (Spencer, Lancet Neurol 1(6):375-382, 2002; Wiebe et al., N Engl J Med 345(5):311-318, 2001; Yasargil et al., J Neurosurg 112(1):168-185, 2010). Nowadays, direct electrical stimulation (in the form of low- or high-frequency stimulation) in the location involved in seizures is used as a potentially suitable treatment method for this destructive disease in both laboratory animals and humans (Goodman et al., Epilepsia 46(1):1-7, 2005; Richardson et al., Epilepsia 44(6):768-777, 2003; Velasco et al., Epilepsia 41(2):158-169, 2000). Low-frequency stimulation causes less damage to the epileptic area and surrounding neuronal structures compared to high-frequency stimulation, and it can be a suitable option for patients suffering from epilepsy (Goodman et al., Epilepsia 46(1):1-7, 2005). Since the cellular mechanism of this stimulation is not clearly known, the purpose of this review research was to investigate the anticonvulsive effects of low-frequency electrical stimulation and the probable cellular mechanism involved in it.

Indexed as

Kindling, NeurologicAnimalsElectric Stimulation TherapyEpilepsySeizuresAntiepileptic effectsCellular mechanismKindlingLow-frequency stimulationSeizure

Identifiers

PMID27566615
OpenAlexW2517442475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.