SynthesisBMC oral health2016
Should oral anticoagulant therapy be continued during dental extraction? A meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC oral health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Treatment Effects in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies of Pharmacological Interventions: A Meta-Analysis.JAMA network open · 2024Pooled it
- The Effect of Direct Oral Anticoagulant Therapy (DOACs) on oral surgical procedures: a systematic review.BMC oral health · 2023Pooled it
- Perioperative Management of Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients Who Undergo Dental Procedures: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Network Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Pooled it
- Bleeding Risk in Patients Using Oral Anticoagulants Undergoing Surgical Procedures in Dentistry: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2019Pooled it
- Antifibrinolytic therapy for preventing oral bleeding in people on anticoagulants undergoing minor oral surgery or dental extractions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Review
- Oral anticoagulant periprocedural management in patients undergoing an oral, dental implant or periodontal surgery: a prospective national observational survey.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025Article
- Post-extraction bleeding in patients on direct oral anticoagulants.Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons · 2024Article
- Bleeding and thromboembolic risk in patients under anticoagulant therapy receiving oral surgery: a systematic review.Medicine and pharmacy reports · 2023Review
- Local Tranexamic Acid for Preventing Hemorrhage in Anticoagulated Patients Undergoing Dental and Minor Oral Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Experts' consensus on perioperative management of tooth extractions in patients receiving oral antithrombotic treatment.Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2022Article
- Bleeding disorders in implant dentistry: a narrative review and a treatment guide.International journal of implant dentistry · 2022Review
- Risk factors for bleeding after dental extractions in patients receiving antithrombotic drugs - A case control study.Journal of dental sciences · 2022Article
- Bleeding Outcomes After Dental Extraction in Patients Under Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants vs. Vitamin K Antagonists: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Review
- Effect of warfarin discontinuation on the incidence of postoperative bleeding in tooth extraction.Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons · 2020Article
- Periodontitis and cardiovascular diseases: Consensus report.Journal of clinical periodontology · 2020Review
- Periodontitis and Cardiovascular Diseases. Consensus Report.Global heart · 2020Review
- Bleeding risk in patients using oral anticoagulants submitted to surgical procedures in dentistry: a systematic review protocol.BMJ open · 2017Article
- Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Three Local Hemostatic Agents for Dental Extractions in Patients under Chronic Anticoagulant Therapy - A Comparative Study.Annals of maxillofacial surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOral anticoagulation therapy is widely used to reduce the risks of thromboembolism. However, the therapy increases the risk of hemorrhage during the surgical procedures. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the bleeding risk of patients continuing or discontinuing oral anticoagulant therapy while undergoing dental extractions.
methodsSix electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, Web of Science, China Biology Medicine disc (CBM), and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), were searched in March, 2016. Relevant articles were screened by two independent reviewers under our inclusion criteria. Quality was evaluated using the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool. Meta-analyses were conducted with fixed and random effects models as appropriate.
resultsSix studies (with a total of 591 patients) were included in our meta-analysis. Our results showed that there was no significant difference in the bleeding risk between patients continuing or discontinuing oral anticoagulant therapy while undergoing dental extractions (risk ratio, 1.31; 95 % CI, 0.79, 2.14; P > 0.05). There was also no significant difference in bleeding risk 1 day (risk ratio, 0.91; 95 % CI, 0.35, 2.37; P > 0.05) and 7 days (risk ratio, 1.47; 95 % CI, 0.83, 2.59; P > 0.05) after the dental extraction.
conclusionUnder current studies and evidence, it appears that patients continuing oral anticoagulant therapy do not have an increased risk of bleeding after dental extractions compared to patients who discontinue oral anticoagulant therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.