Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27566475›Full record

Trial reportClinical rheumatology2017

Comparing the accuracy and efficacy of ultrasound-guided versus blind injections of steroid in the glenohumeral joint in patients with shoulder adhesive capsulitis.

Seyed Ahmad Raeissadat, Seyed Mansoor Rayegani, Taraneh Faghihi Langroudi, Maryam Khoiniha

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical rheumatology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Seyed Ahmad RaeissadatClinical Research Development Center of Shahid Modarres Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Saadat Abad, Tehran, 1998734383, Iran.
Seyed Mansoor RayeganiDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Shohadaye Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Saadat Abad, Tehran, 1989934148, Iran.
Taraneh Faghihi LangroudiClinical Research Development Center of Shahid Modarres Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Saadat Abad, Tehran, 1998734383, Iran.
Maryam KhoinihaDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Shahid Modarres Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Saadat Abad, Tehran, 1998734383, Iran. maryamkhoiniha@gmail.com.
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shoulder adhesive capsulitis is a condition mainly characterized by a decreased range of motion (ROM), with a lifelong prevalence of 2-5 %. Intra-articular steroid injection is an important treatment in this disease. It has been suggested that ultrasound-guided (US-guided) intra-articular injections are more accurate and effective than blind injections. This randomized clinical trial was designed to compare efficacy and accuracy of US-guided injections versus blind injections of steroid in the glenohumeral joint. Forty-one patients diagnosed with shoulder adhesive capsulitis were included. Patients randomly underwent intra-articular injection either blind or under guidance of ultrasound by a specialist. Immediately after injection, radiograms were obtained to assess the accuracy of injection. Demographic characteristics, their functional status, the severity of pain, and the ROM were gathered and compared between the two groups. Twenty patients in the US-guided group and 21 in the blind group finished the 4-week period of the study. Improvements in pain, ROM, and functional score after 1 and 4 weeks were more prominent in the US-guided group, but the differences were not statistically significant, except for the changes in extension where the improvements were significantly higher in the US-guided group (p = 0.01). The accuracy of injections was also higher in the US-guided group (90 % vs. 76.19 %), but the differences were not found to be significant (p = 0.24). US-guided injections can be more accurate and yield better improvements in pain, ROM, and function of the patients, but they cost more and are time-consuming.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBursitisFemaleHumansInjections, Intra-ArticularIranMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementRange of Motion, ArticularShoulder JointShoulder PainSteroidsTreatment OutcomeSteroidsAdhesive capsulitisIntra-articular injectionShoulderSteroidUltrasound-guided

Identifiers

PMID27566475
OpenAlexW2510986565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.