ReviewJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2017
A sneak peek into digital innovations and wearable sensors for cardiac monitoring.
Review in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Systematic Review of Wearable Sensors and IoT-Based Monitoring Applications for Older Adults - a Focus on Ageing Population and Independent Living.Journal of medical systems · 2019Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of Wearable Patient Monitoring Systems - Current Challenges and Opportunities for Clinical Adoption.Journal of medical systems · 2017Pooled it
- Trial
- Assessment of Respiratory Rate and Simulated Apnea Utilizing the PneumoWave Biosensor: In Vitro and In Vivo Validation.Biosensors · 2026Article
- Advances and applications of biosensors in pulmonary hypertension.Respiratory research · 2025Review
- New sensors for the early detection of clinical deterioration on general wards and beyond - a clinician's perspective.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2025Review
- Smartphone-Based versus Non-Invasive Automatic Oscillometric Brachial Cuff Blood Pressure Measurements: A Prospective Method Comparison Volunteer Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Review on the Advancements of Stethoscope Types in Chest Auscultation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- "Digital biomarkers" in preclinical heart failure models - a further step towards improved translational research.Heart failure reviews · 2023Review
- One small wearable, one giant leap for patient safety?Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2022Article
- Sensors for Context-Aware Smart Healthcare: A Security Perspective.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Early Detection of Exposure to Toxic Chemicals Using Continuously Recorded Multi-Sensor Physiology.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Challenges and Opportunities in Consumer Neuroergonomics.Frontiers in neuroergonomics · 2021Article
- Contribution of telemedicine and information technology to hypertension control.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2020Review
- Automated continuous noninvasive ward monitoring: future directions and challenges.Critical care (London, England) · 2019Article
- Lung water assessment: from gravimetry to wearables.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2019Article
- A Tablet-Based Assessment of Rhythmic Ability.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Article
- The future of intraoperative blood pressure management.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2018Article
- Novel Strategies on Personalized Medicine for Breast Cancer Treatment: An Update.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017Review
- Intensive care medicine in 2050: NEWS for hemodynamic monitoring.Intensive care medicine · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many mobile phone or tablet applications have been designed to control cardiovascular risk factors (obesity, smoking, sedentary lifestyle, diabetes and hypertension) or to optimize treatment adherence. Some have been shown to be useful but the long-term benefits remain to be demonstrated. Digital stethoscopes make easier the interpretation of abnormal heart sounds, and the development of pocket-sized echo machines may quickly and significantly expand the use of ultrasounds. Daily home monitoring of pulmonary artery pressures with wireless implantable sensors has been shown to be associated with a significant decrease in hospital readmissions for heart failure. There are more and more non-invasive, wireless, and wearable sensors designed to monitor heart rate, heart rate variability, respiratory rate, arterial oxygen saturation, and thoracic fluid content. They have the potential to change the way we monitor and treat patients with cardiovascular diseases in the hospital and beyond. Some may have the ability to improve quality of care, decrease the number of medical visits and hospitalization, and ultimately health care costs. Validation and outcome studies are needed to clarify, among the growing number of digital innovations and wearable sensors, which tools have real clinical value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.