Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27566405›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

Comprehensive structural and dynamical view of an unfolded protein from the combination of single-molecule FRET, NMR, and SAXS.

Mikayel Aznauryan, Leonildo Delgado, Andrea Soranno, Daniel Nettels, Jie-Rong Huang, Alexander M Labhardt, Stephan Grzesiek, Benjamin Schuler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mikayel AznauryanDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland;
Leonildo DelgadoBiozentrum, University of Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland;
Andrea SorannoDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland;
Daniel NettelsDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland;
Jie-Rong HuangInstitute of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, National Yang Ming University, Taipei City 112, Taiwan;
Alexander M LabhardtBiozentrum, University of Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland;
Stephan GrzesiekBiozentrum, University of Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland; stephan.grzesiek@unibas.ch schuler@bioc.uzh.ch.
Benjamin SchulerDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Physics, University of Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland stephan.grzesiek@unibas.ch schuler@bioc.uzh.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The properties of unfolded proteins are essential both for the mechanisms of protein folding and for the function of the large group of intrinsically disordered proteins. However, the detailed structural and dynamical characterization of these highly dynamic and conformationally heterogeneous ensembles has remained challenging. Here we combine and compare three of the leading techniques for the investigation of unfolded proteins, NMR spectroscopy (NMR), small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), and single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET), with the goal of quantitatively testing their consistency and complementarity and for obtaining a comprehensive view of the unfolded-state ensemble. Using unfolded ubiquitin as a test case, we find that its average dimensions derived from FRET and from structural ensembles calculated using the program X-PLOR-NIH based on NMR and SAXS restraints agree remarkably well; even the shapes of the underlying intramolecular distance distributions are in good agreement, attesting to the reliability of the approaches. The NMR-based results provide a highly sensitive way of quantifying residual structure in the unfolded state. FRET-based nanosecond fluorescence correlation spectroscopy allows long-range distances and chain dynamics to be probed in a time range inaccessible by NMR. The combined techniques thus provide a way of optimally using the complementarity of the available methods for a quantitative structural and dynamical description of unfolded proteins both at the global and the local level.

Indexed as

Protein UnfoldingFluorescence Resonance Energy TransferNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularProtein ConformationProteinsScattering, Small AngleSingle Molecule ImagingProteinsFörster resonance energy transfernuclear magnetic resonanceprotein foldingsmall-angle X-ray scatteringunfolded protein ensemble

Identifiers

PMID27566405
PMCPMC5027429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.