ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016
Generic phase diagram of binary superlattices.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Self-assembly pathways towards floppy colloidal square lattices.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Macroscopic photonic single crystals via seeded growth of DNA-coated colloids.Nature communications · 2023Article
- A Deep Learning Framework Discovers Compositional Order and Self-Assembly Pathways in Binary Colloidal Mixtures.JACS Au · 2022Article
- A Journey Through the Landscapes of Small Particles in Binary Colloidal Assemblies: Unveiling Structural Transitions from Isolated Particles to Clusters upon Variation in Composition.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Using symmetry to elucidate the importance of stoichiometry in colloidal crystal assembly.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emergence of a large variety of self-assembled superlattices is a dramatic recent trend in the fields of nanoparticle and colloidal sciences. Motivated by this development, we propose a model that combines simplicity with a remarkably rich phase behavior applicable to a wide range of such self-assembled systems. Those systems include nanoparticle and colloidal assemblies driven by DNA-mediated interactions, electrostatics, and possibly, controlled drying. In our model, a binary system of large and small hard spheres (L and S, respectively) interacts via selective short-range ("sticky") attraction. In its simplest version, this binary sticky sphere model features attraction only between S and L particles. We show that, in the limit when this attraction is sufficiently strong compared with [Formula: see text], the problem becomes purely geometrical: the thermodynamically preferred state should maximize the number of [Formula: see text] contacts. A general procedure for constructing the phase diagram as a function of system composition f and particle size ratio r is outlined. In this way, the global phase behavior can be calculated very efficiently for a given set of plausible candidate phases. Furthermore, the geometric nature of the problem enables us to generate those candidate phases through a well-defined and intuitive construction. We calculate the phase diagrams for both 2D and 3D systems and compare the results with existing experiments. Most of the 3D superlattices observed to date are featured in our phase diagram, whereas several more are predicted for future discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.