Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27566263›Full record

Trial reportCancer science2016

Pharmacologic study (JP28927) of alectinib in Japanese patients with ALK+ non-small-cell lung cancer with or without prior crizotinib therapy.

Toyoaki Hida, Kazuhiko Nakagawa, Takashi Seto, Miyako Satouchi, Makoto Nishio, Katsuyuki Hotta, Toshiaki Takahashi, Yuichiro Ohe, Koji Takeda, Masahiro Tatsuno and 4 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Systematic review of sequencing of ALK inhibitors inLung Cancer (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Toyoaki HidaDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan.
Kazuhiko NakagawaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Takashi SetoDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, National Kyusyu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Miyako SatouchiDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Hyogo Cancer Center, Akashi, Japan.
Makoto NishioDepartment of Thoracic Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Katsuyuki HottaDepartment of Allergy and Respiratory Medicine, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
Toshiaki TakahashiDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Yuichiro OheDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Koji TakedaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Osaka City General Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Masahiro TatsunoTranslational Clinical Research Science & Strategy Department, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Takashi AsakawaClinical Science & Strategy Department, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Tadashi ShimadaClinical Science & Strategy Department, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Tomohiro TanakaClinical Science & Strategy Department, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Tomohide TamuraDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety data for a new 150-mg alectinib capsule in ALK+ non-small-cell lung cancer in a multicenter, open-label pharmacologic study (JP28927). Eligible patients (≥20 years, locally advanced/metastatic ALK+ disease, ALK inhibitor-naïve and -pretreated [including crizotinib refractory]) were randomized 1:1 to receive one of two sequences of alectinib 300 mg twice daily (comprising different schedules of 20/40-mg and 150-mg capsules) until investigator-determined lack of clinical benefit. Co-primary endpoints were: bioequivalence of alectinib 20/40 mg vs 150 mg; food effect with 150 mg; and safety. Thirty-five patients were enrolled; median treatment duration was 13.1 months (range 1.1-15.0). Under fasting conditions, exposure of the two formulations was similar; mean AUC

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnaplastic Lymphoma KinaseCarbazolesCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCrizotinibDisease-Free SurvivalFastingFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPiperidinesPyrazolesPyridinesalectinibALK protein, humanAnaplastic Lymphoma KinaseCarbazolesCrizotinibPiperidinesPyrazolesPyridinesReceptor Protein-Tyrosine KinasesAlectinibanaplastic lymphoma kinasebioequivalenceJapanesenon-small-cell lung cancer

Identifiers

PMID27566263
PMCPMC5132270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.