Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27565768›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2016

Cross-sectional study of Fasciola gigantica and other trematode infections of cattle in Edu Local Government Area, Kwara State, north-central Nigeria.

Nusirat Elelu, Abdulganiyu Ambali, Gerald C Coles, Mark C Eisler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. High prevalence of liver fluke infestation,Open veterinary journal · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Potential Hybridization ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  13. Seasonal dynamics ofVeterinary world · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Economic model of bovine fasciolosis in Nigeria: an update.Tropical animal health and production · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nusirat EleluUniversity of Ilorin, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ilorin, Kwara State, Nigeria. nusyelelu@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1255-4572
Abdulganiyu AmbaliUniversity of Ilorin, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ilorin, Kwara State, Nigeria.
Gerald C ColesUniversity of Bristol, School of Veterinary Science, Langford, Bristol, BS40 5DU, UK.
Mark C EislerUniversity of Bristol, School of Veterinary Science, Langford, Bristol, BS40 5DU, UK.
University of Bristol · GBUniversity of Ilorin · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTrematode infections of livestock are of global veterinary and public health importance causing serious economic losses. Majority of data on burden of trematode infections in Nigeria are based on abattoir surveys and there are very few data on herd level risk factors. The present study investigated the prevalence of, and herd level risk factors for, fasciolosis and other trematode infections in cattle in Edu Local Government Area (LGA).

methodsA cross-sectional survey used two-stage study design to investigate cattle belonging to 65 households. Two questionnaires were administered for household-level and individual cattle-level data. Faecal and blood samples were obtained from the cattle. Logistic regression analyses were performed to determine risk factors for infections.

resultsOf 686 faecal samples analysed, 74.9 %, 16.1 %, 7.3 % and 1.2 % were positive for infections with Fasciola gigantica, paramphistomes, Dicrocoelium hospes and Schistosoma bovis respectively. Fasciola gigantica had higher prevalence in adult cattle (77.3 %) than weaners (62.5 %). Majority of co-infections was a combination of F. gigantica with paramphistomes 84/130 (64.6 %). Most (58.9 %) of the cattle belonged to FAMACHA© score 2. The mean packed cell volume (PCV) was 34.4 %. The sensitivity and specificity of FAMACHA© for anaemia (PCV < 24 %) were 18.2 and 96.9 %, respectively. Positive correlation was obtained between faecal egg counts for F. gigantica and paramphistomes (R = 0.15, P = 0.0001). Adult cattle were more likely to be infected with F. gigantica (odds ratio, OR: 1.94; Confidence Interval, CI: 1.19-3.16) than weaners. Cattle belonging to household heads aged between 40-59 years were more likely infected with paramphistomes (OR: 1.95; CI: 1.02-3.74) than those belonging to other age groups. Cattles from herds with size ≥ 100 were more likely infected with D. hospes than those from smaller herds (OR: 6.98; CI: 2.94-16.6).

conclusionThis study revealed high prevalence of infection with F. gigantica in Kwara State. The co-infections by F. gigantica and paramphistomes with a positive correlation should be considered during anthelmintic therapy. There is a need to optimise and validate the FAMACHA© for use in cattle based on breeds and variation in colour of ocular mucous membrane. Risk factors identified could assist in tailoring control strategies for various trematode infections to particular groups of farmers and cattle.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnimalsCattleCattle DiseasesCross-Sectional StudiesData CollectionFarmersFasciolaFascioliasisFecesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNigeriaDicrocoeliumFAMACHA©FasciolaKwaraNigeriaParamphistomesPrevalenceRisk factorsSchistosomaTrematodes

Identifiers

PMID27565768
PMCPMC5002138
OpenAlexW2465238023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.