Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27565644›Full record

ArticleWiener klinische Wochenschrift2017

Vaccine hesitancy in Austria : A cross-sectional survey.

Michael J Sandhofer, Oliver Robak, Herbert Frank, Johannes Kulnig

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Disparities in Seasonal Influenza Vaccination in Europe.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2025
    Review
  4. Seroprevalence against measles, Austria, stratified by birth years 1922 to 2024.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Factors Influencing Vaccination in Korea: Findings From Focus Group Interviews.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michael J SandhoferDepartment of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Tulln, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Alter Ziegelweg 10, 3430, Tulln, Austria. michael.sandhofer@tulln.lknoe.at.
Oliver RobakDepartment of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Herbert FrankDepartment of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Tulln, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Alter Ziegelweg 10, 3430, Tulln, Austria.
Johannes KulnigDepartment of Pediatrics and Neonatology, University Hospital Tulln, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Tulln, Austria.
Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences · ATMedical University of Vienna · ATUniversitätsklinikum Tulln · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVaccine hesitancy is an emerging phenomenon particularly in industrialized nations. It has led to repeated epidemic outbreaks of otherwise vaccine-preventable, infectious diseases. Compared to other countries very low rates of influenza and measles vaccination rates have been reported in Austria.

methodsWe performed a single-center cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey. A total of 350 adult patients attending our emergency room participated in this survey. We assessed knowledge and attitudes towards vaccination and the associated infectious diseases.

resultsOut of 350 participants 40 (11.4 %) declared that they deliberately refused vaccinations. Most common reasons for non-vaccination were fear of adverse effects (35.9 %), doubt of effectiveness of vaccines (35.9 %) and distrust towards the pharmaceutical industry (23.1 %). Of all 350 participants only 148 (42.3 %) thought themselves to be sufficiently informed about national vaccination recommendations as stated in the Austrian National Vaccination Program (ANVP). General practitioners (GP) were the primary source of healthcare-related information for 256 (73.1 %) participants. Furthermore, GPs as well as hospital-based physicians achieved the highest level of trust in this study population.

conclusionsThe results of our study underline the necessity of comprehensive informational campaigns on the merits of vaccination. A lack of knowledge about the benefits of vaccination, uncertainty and unfounded fears seem to prevent the achievement of recommended vaccination rates. Family GPs enjoyed the highest levels of trust in our study population. We believe that additional information communicated by GPs could help boost the low vaccination rates. This study underlines the important role of primary care practitioners in informing patients about vaccines and healthcare topics.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthAustriaCross-Sectional StudiesEducational StatusFemaleHealth Care SurveysHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth LiteracyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareSex DistributionTrustVaccinationVaccination RefusalInfluenza vaccinationMeasles outbreaksMeasles vaccinationVaccinationVaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID27565644
OpenAlexW2513450740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.