Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27565625›Full record

Trial reportTrials2016

Representativeness of the participants in the smoking Cessation in Pregnancy Incentives Trial (CPIT): a cross-sectional study.

Barnabas Bessing, Linda Bauld, Lesley Sinclair, Daniel F Mackay, William Spence, David M Tappin

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Barnabas BessingWorld Health Organization, Section of Expanded Programme on Immunization, Ground Floor, UNECA building, Box 3069, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Linda BauldCentre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, School of Health Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK.
Lesley SinclairCentre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, School of Health Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK.
Daniel F MackayInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, Public Health, University of Glasgow, 1 Lilybank Gardens, Glasgow, G12 8RZ, Scotland, UK.
William SpenceSchool of Medicine, University of Glasgow, 1 Lilybank Gardens, Glasgow, G12 8RZ, Scotland, UK.
David M TappinSection of Child Health, School of Medicine, Glasgow University, Scottish Cot Death Trust, West Glasgow Ambulatory Hospital, Yorkhill, Glasgow, G3 8SJ, UK. david.tappin@glasgow.ac.uk.

Funding

Chief Scientist Office CZH/4/594World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe limited representativeness of trial samples may restrict external validity. The aim of this study was to ascertain the representativeness of the population enrolled in the Cessation in Pregnancy Incentives Trial (CPIT), a therapeutic exploratory study to examine the effectiveness of financial incentives for smoking cessation during pregnancy.

methodsCPIT participants (n = 492) were compared with all self-reported smokers at maternity booking who did not participate in the trial (n = 1982). Both groups were drawn from the National Health Service (NHS) Greater Glasgow and Clyde area over a 1-year trial enrolment period. Variables used for comparison were age, area-based deprivation index, body mass index, gestation, and carbon monoxide (CO) breath test level. Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare groups.

resultsFrom January to December 2012, 2474/13,945 (17.7 %) women, who booked for maternity care, self-reported as current smokers (at least one cigarette in the last week). Seven hundred and fifty-two were ineligible for trial participation because of a CO breath test level of less than 7 parts per million (ppm) used as a biochemical cut-off to corroborate self-report of current smoking. At telephone consent 301 could not be contacted, 11 had miscarried, 16 did not give consent and 3 opted out after randomisation, leaving 492 participants for analysis. There were no differences in demographic or clinical characteristics between trial participants, and self-reported smokers not enrolled in the trial in terms of CO breath test (as a measure of smoking level for those with a CO level of 7 ppm or higher), material deprivation (using an area-based measure), maternal age and maternal body mass index. Gestation at booking was statistically significantly lower for participants.

conclusionsTo ensure that all trial participants were smokers, biochemical validation excluded self-reported smokers with a CO level of less than 7 ppm from taking part in the trial, which excluded 30 % of self-reported smokers who were 'lighter' smokers. The efficacy of financial incentives would not have been likely to decrease if 'lighter' smokers had been included in the trial population. Trial participants were slightly earlier in their pregnancy at maternity booking, but this difference would not clinically affect the provision of financial incentives if provided routinely. Overall, the trial population was representative of all self-reported smokers with regard to available routinely collected data. Appropriate comparison of trial and target populations, with detailed reporting of exclusion criteria would contribute to the understanding of the wider applicability of trial results.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN87508788 . Registered/Assigned on 1 September 2011.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorIncomeMotivationAdultChi-Square DistributionCross-Sectional StudiesEconomicsFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMothersPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPrenatal CareRewardRisk FactorsClinical markersCross-sectional studiesData collectionDemographyTreatment effectiveness

Identifiers

PMID27565625
PMCPMC5002204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.