Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27565623›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2016

Antimicrobial Peptide Resistance Genes in the Plant Pathogen Dickeya dadantii.

Caroline Pandin, Martine Caroff, Guy Condemine

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Biocontrol of Soft RotMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  4. Genome Analysis ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Draft Genome Sequences of Enterobacter spp.,Microbiology resource announcements · 2021
    Article
  8. International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. DltX ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Caroline PandinUniversité Lyon, INSA de Lyon, CNRS UMR5240 Microbiologie Adaptation et Pathogénie, Villeurbanne, France.
Martine CaroffInstitute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), CEA, CNRS, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France LPS-BioSciences, Université de Paris-Sud, Orsay, France.
Guy CondemineUniversité Lyon, INSA de Lyon, CNRS UMR5240 Microbiologie Adaptation et Pathogénie, Villeurbanne, France guy.condemine@insa-lyon.fr.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRCommissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives · FRLaboratoire de Microbiologie, Adaptation et Pathogénie · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modification of teichoic acid through the incorporation of d-alanine confers resistance in Gram-positive bacteria to antimicrobial peptides (AMPs). This process involves the products of the dltXABCD genes. These genes are widespread in Gram-positive bacteria, and they are also found in a few Gram-negative bacteria. Notably, these genes are present in all soft-rot enterobacteria (Pectobacterium and Dickeya) whose dltDXBAC operons have been sequenced. We studied the function and regulation of these genes in Dickeya dadantii dltB expression was induced in the presence of the AMP polymyxin. It was not regulated by PhoP, which controls the expression of some genes involved in AMP resistance, but was regulated by ArcA, which has been identified as an activator of genes involved in AMP resistance. However, arcA was not the regulator responsible for polymyxin induction of these genes in this bacterium, which underlines the complexity of the mechanisms controlling AMP resistance in D. dadantii Two other genes involved in resistance to AMPs have also been characterized, phoS and phoH dltB, phoS, phoH, and arcA but not dltD mutants were more sensitive to polymyxin than the wild-type strain. Decreased fitness of the dltB, phoS, and phoH mutants in chicory leaves indicates that their products are important for resistance to plant AMPs. IMPORTANCE: Gram-negative bacteria can modify their lipopolysaccharides (LPSs) to resist antimicrobial peptides (AMPs). Soft-rot enterobacteria (Dickeya and Pectobacterium spp.) possess homologues of the dlt genes in their genomes which, in Gram-positive bacteria, are involved in resistance to AMPs. In this study, we show that these genes confer resistance to AMPs, probably by modifying LPSs, and that they are required for the fitness of the bacteria during plant infection. Two other new genes involved in resistance were also analyzed. These results show that bacterial resistance to AMPs can occur in bacteria through many different mechanisms that need to be characterized.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesBacterial ProteinsCichorium intybusDrug Resistance, BacterialEnterobacteriaceaeGene Expression Regulation, BacterialMutationPlant LeavesPolymyxinsRepressor ProteinsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesBacterial ProteinsPhoP protein, BacteriaPolymyxinsRepressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID27565623
PMCPMC5066359
OpenAlexW2539288814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.