Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27565611›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2017

CTNND

Wei Wang, Yang Fei, Sheng-Li Liu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 88% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wei WangDepartment of General Surgery, Bayi Hospital Affiliated Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine/The 81st Hospital of P.L.A., Nanjing, China.
Yang FeiDepartment of General Surgery, Bayi Hospital Affiliated Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine/The 81st Hospital of P.L.A., Nanjing, China.
Sheng-Li LiuDepartment of General Surgery, ZhongDa Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine · CNZhongda Hospital Southeast University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the relationship between 755 T>G polymorphisms in the CTNND

methodsCTNND

resultsIn control subjects, the frequency of T/T and G/T genotypes, and T and G alleles was 79.4%, 17.2%, 88.1%, and 11.9%, respectively. The distribution of genotypes and allelotypes in the pancreatic carcinoma patients was significantly different from that in the controls (P = 0.007, P = 0.012). Combined GG and GT genotypes were found to have a higher OR in male pancreatic carcinoma patients and the group under the age of 70 years (males: OR, 1.409; 95%CI, 0.912~1.921; under 70 years: OR 1.626; 95% CI, 0.878~2.312). This study also showed a distinct difference in the distribution of P120ctn and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) between Chinese and Canadian (11.9% vs. 3.9%, P = 0.008).

conclusionCTNND

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAsian PeopleCase-Control StudiesCateninsDelta CateninFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMaleMiddle AgedPancreatic NeoplasmsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideCateninsCTNND1 protein, humanDelta CateninCTNND 1gene polymorphismpancreatic carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID27565611
PMCPMC6817266
OpenAlexW2515210437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.