ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2017
CTNND
Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lymphoma in Border Collies: Genome-Wide Association and Pedigree Analysis.Veterinary sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the relationship between 755 T>G polymorphisms in the CTNND
methodsCTNND
resultsIn control subjects, the frequency of T/T and G/T genotypes, and T and G alleles was 79.4%, 17.2%, 88.1%, and 11.9%, respectively. The distribution of genotypes and allelotypes in the pancreatic carcinoma patients was significantly different from that in the controls (P = 0.007, P = 0.012). Combined GG and GT genotypes were found to have a higher OR in male pancreatic carcinoma patients and the group under the age of 70 years (males: OR, 1.409; 95%CI, 0.912~1.921; under 70 years: OR 1.626; 95% CI, 0.878~2.312). This study also showed a distinct difference in the distribution of P120ctn and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) between Chinese and Canadian (11.9% vs. 3.9%, P = 0.008).
conclusionCTNND
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.