Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27565585›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2016

Imbalanced multi-label learning for identifying antimicrobial peptides and their functional types.

Weizhong Lin, Dong Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Weizhong Linnformation Engineering School, Jingdezhen Ceramic Institute, Jingdezhen 333406, China.
Dong XuDepartment of Computer Science and Christopher S. Bond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.

Funding

Development of MUFOLD for Building High-Accuracy Protein Structure ModelsR01GM100701 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI XU, DONG · 2012 to 2016
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM100701
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationWith the rapid increase of infection resistance to antibiotics, it is urgent to find novel infection therapeutics. In recent years, antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) have been utilized as potential alternatives for infection therapeutics. AMPs are key components of the innate immune system and can protect the host from various pathogenic bacteria. Identifying AMPs and their functional types has led to many studies, and various predictors using machine learning have been developed. However, there is room for improvement; in particular, no predictor takes into account the lack of balance among different functional AMPs.

resultsIn this paper, a new synthetic minority over-sampling technique on imbalanced and multi-label datasets, referred to as ML-SMOTE, was designed for processing and identifying AMPs' functional families. A novel multi-label classifier, MLAMP, was also developed using ML-SMOTE and grey pseudo amino acid composition. The classifier obtained 0.4846 subset accuracy and 0.16 hamming loss. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: A user-friendly web-server for MLAMP was established at http://www.jci-bioinfo.cn/MLAMP CONTACTS: linweizhong@jci.edu.cn or xudong@missouri.edu.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAmino AcidsAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesComputational BiologyInternetModels, TheoreticalAmino AcidsAntimicrobial Cationic Peptides

Identifiers

PMID27565585
PMCPMC5167070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.