ArticleBMC bioinformatics2016
Statistical inference for time course RNA-Seq data using a negative binomial mixed-effect model.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- PETScan: score-based genome-wide association analysis of RNA-Seq and ATAC-Seq data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Model-to-crop conserved NUE Regulons enhance machine learning predictions of nitrogen use efficiency.The Plant cell · 2025Article
- Multiomics Network Medicine Approaches to Precision Medicine and Therapeutics in Cardiovascular Diseases.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2023Review
- A Survey of Statistical Methods for Microbiome Data Analysis.Frontiers in applied mathematics and statistics · 2022Article
- New genomic resources and comparative analyses reveal differences in floral gene expression in selfing and outcrossing Collinsia sister species.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2021Article
- Negative Binomial mixed models estimated with the maximum likelihood method can be used for longitudinal RNAseq data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Review
- Article
- State-Transition Analysis of Time-Sequential Gene Expression Identifies Critical Points That Predict Development of Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Cancer research · 2020Article
- TimeMeter assesses temporal gene expression similarity and identifies differentially progressing genes.Nucleic acids research · 2020Article
- Temporal dynamics in meta longitudinal RNA-Seq data.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Comparative analysis of differential gene expression tools for RNA sequencing time course data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2019Article
- Trendy: segmented regression analysis of expression dynamics in high-throughput ordered profiling experiments.BMC bioinformatics · 2018Article
- Insight into Genes Regulating Postharvest Aflatoxin Contamination of Tetraploid Peanut from Transcriptional Profiling.Genetics · 2018Article
- Silhouette Scores for Arbitrary Defined Groups in Gene Expression Data and Insights into Differential Expression Results.Biological procedures online · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccurate identification of differentially expressed (DE) genes in time course RNA-Seq data is crucial for understanding the dynamics of transcriptional regulatory network. However, most of the available methods treat gene expressions at different time points as replicates and test the significance of the mean expression difference between treatments or conditions irrespective of time. They thus fail to identify many DE genes with different profiles across time. In this article, we propose a negative binomial mixed-effect model (NBMM) to identify DE genes in time course RNA-Seq data. In the NBMM, mean gene expression is characterized by a fixed effect, and time dependency is described by random effects. The NBMM is very flexible and can be fitted to both unreplicated and replicated time course RNA-Seq data via a penalized likelihood method. By comparing gene expression profiles over time, we further classify the DE genes into two subtypes to enhance the understanding of expression dynamics. A significance test for detecting DE genes is derived using a Kullback-Leibler distance ratio. Additionally, a significance test for gene sets is developed using a gene set score.
resultsSimulation analysis shows that the NBMM outperforms currently available methods for detecting DE genes and gene sets. Moreover, our real data analysis of fruit fly developmental time course RNA-Seq data demonstrates the NBMM identifies biologically relevant genes which are well justified by gene ontology analysis.
conclusionsThe proposed method is powerful and efficient to detect biologically relevant DE genes and gene sets in time course RNA-Seq data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.