Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27565154›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2017

Recurrent bladder carcinoma: clinical and prognostic role of 18 F-FDG PET/CT.

Pierpaolo Alongi, Federico Caobelli, Roberta Gentile, Alessandro Stefano, Giorgio Russo, Domenico Albano, Sergio Baldari, Maria Carla Gilardi, Massimo Midiri

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Survival prediction ofCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. PET Imaging in Bladder Cancer: An Update and Future Direction.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The Role of Imaging in Bladder Cancer Diagnosis and Staging.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Cancers · 2019
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Diagnostic and prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in recurrent germinal tumor carcinoma.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2018
    Article
  19. Imaging features of solid renal masses.The British journal of radiology · 2017
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Pierpaolo AlongiDepartment of Radiological Sciences, Nuclear Medicine Unit, San Raffaele G. Giglio Institute, Contrada Pietrapollastra-Pisciotto, 90015, Cefalù, Italy. alongi.pierpaolo@gmail.com.
Federico CaobelliDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Basel University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland.
Roberta GentileNuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Alessandro StefanoIBFM-CNR, Cefalù, Italy.
Giorgio RussoIBFM-CNR, Cefalù, Italy.
Domenico AlbanoDIBIMEF - Sezione di Scienze Radiologiche, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Sergio BaldariNuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Maria Carla GilardiIBFM-CNR, Cefalù, Italy.
Massimo MidiriDepartment of Radiological Sciences, Nuclear Medicine Unit, San Raffaele G. Giglio Institute, Contrada Pietrapollastra-Pisciotto, 90015, Cefalù, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimA small number of studies evaluated the detection rate of lesions from bladder carcinoma (BC) of 18 F-FDG PET/CT in the restaging process. However, the prognostic role of FDG PET/CT still remains unclear. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the accuracy, the effect upon treatment decision, and the prognostic value of FDG PET/CT in patients with suspected recurrent BC. MATERIALS AND

methodsForty-one patients affected by BC underwent FDG PET/CT for restaging purpose. The diagnostic accuracy of visually interpreted FDG PET/CT was assessed compared to histology (n = 8), other diagnostic imaging modalities (contrast-enhanced CT in 38/41 patients and MRI in 15/41) and clinical follow-up (n = 41). Semiquantitative PET values (SUVmax, SUVmean, SUL, MTV, TLG) were calculated using a graph-based method. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed by using Kaplan-Meier curves. The risk of progression (hazard ratio, HR) was computed by Cox regression analysis by considering all the available variables.

resultsPET was considered positive in 21 of 41 patients. Of these, recurrent BC was confirmed in 20 (95 %). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of FDG PET/CT were 87 %, 94 %, 95 %, 85 %, 90 %. AUC was 0.9 (95 %IC 0.8-1). Bayesian positive and negative likelihood ratios were 14.5 and 0.13, respectively. FDG PET/CT findings modified the therapeutic approach in 16 patients (modified therapy in 10 PET-positive patients, watch-and-wait in six PET-negative patients). PFS was significantly longer in patients with negative scan vs. those with pathological findings (85 % vs. 24 %, p < 0.05; HR = 12.4; p = 0.001). Moreover, an unremarkable study was associated with a longer OS (88 % vs. 47 % after 2 years and 87 % vs. 25 % after 3 years, respectively, p < 0.05). Standardized uptake value (SUV)max > 6 and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) > 8.5 were recognized as the most accurate thresholds to predict PFS (2-year PFS 62 % for SUVmax < 6 vs. 15 % for SUVmax > 6, p = 0.018; 2-year PFS 66 % for TLG < 8.5 vs. 18 % for TLG > 8.5, p = 0.09).

conclusionA very good diagnostic performance for FDG PET/CT was confirmed in patients with suspected recurrent BC. FDG PET/CT allowed for a change in treatment decision in about 40 % of cases and showed an important prognostic value in assessing PFS and OS.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18AgedDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansItalyMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyPrevalencePrognosisRadiopharmaceuticalsReproducibility of ResultsRisk FactorsSensitivity and SpecificitySurvival RateFluorodeoxyglucose F18Radiopharmaceuticals18 F-FDG-PET/CTBladder cancerClinical rolePrognostic roleRestaging

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.