Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27565139›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2016

Transcriptome responses to temperature, water availability and photoperiod are conserved among mature trees of two divergent Douglas-fir provenances from a coastal and an interior habitat.

Moritz Hess, Henning Wildhagen, Laura Verena Junker, Ingo Ensminger

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Molecular bases of responses to abiotic stress in trees.Journal of experimental botany · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Comparative Analysis of ChloroplastFrontiers in plant science · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Moritz HessForest Research Institute of Baden-Württemberg (FVA), Wonnhaldestrasse 4, D-79100, Freiburg i. Brsg., Germany.
Henning WildhagenForest Research Institute of Baden-Württemberg (FVA), Wonnhaldestrasse 4, D-79100, Freiburg i. Brsg., Germany.
Laura Verena JunkerForest Research Institute of Baden-Württemberg (FVA), Wonnhaldestrasse 4, D-79100, Freiburg i. Brsg., Germany.
Ingo EnsmingerForest Research Institute of Baden-Württemberg (FVA), Wonnhaldestrasse 4, D-79100, Freiburg i. Brsg., Germany. ingo.ensminger@utoronto.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLocal adaptation and phenotypic plasticity are important components of plant responses to variations in environmental conditions. While local adaptation has been widely studied in trees, little is known about plasticity of gene expression in adult trees in response to ever changing environmental conditions in natural habitats. Here we investigate plasticity of gene expression in needle tissue between two Douglas-fir provenances represented by 25 adult trees using deep RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq).

resultsUsing linear mixed models we investigated the effect of temperature, soil water availability and photoperiod on the abundance of 59189 detected transcripts. Expression of more than 80 % of all identified transcripts revealed a response to variations in environmental conditions in the field. GO term overrepresentation analysis revealed gene expression responses to temperature, soil water availability and photoperiod that are highly conserved among many plant taxa. However, expression differences between the two Douglas-fir provenances were rather small compared to the expression differences observed between individual trees. Although the effect of environment on global transcript expression was high, the observed genotype by environment (GxE) interaction of gene expression was surprisingly low, since only 21 of all detected transcripts showed a GxE interaction.

conclusionsThe majority of the transcriptome responses in plant leaf tissue is driven by variations in environmental conditions. The small variation between individuals and populations suggests strong conservation of this response within Douglas-fir. Therefore we conclude that plastic transcriptome responses to variations in environmental conditions are only weakly affected by local adaptation in Douglas-fir.

Indexed as

EcosystemGene Expression ProfilingPhotoperiodTemperatureAbiesAdaptation, PhysiologicalConserved SequenceDose-Response Relationship, DrugGene OntologyMolecular Sequence AnnotationSequence Analysis, RNAWaterWaterDroughtGene expressionHeatLocal adaptationNatural environmentPhenotypic plasticityPhotoperiodPseudotsuga menziesiiRNA-SeqTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID27565139
PMCPMC5002200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.