ArticlePloS one2016
Reconstitution of Protein Translation of Mycobacterium Reveals Functional Conservation and Divergence with the Gram-Negative Bacterium Escherichia coli.
Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- ClpC1-dependent iron homeostasis underlies mycobacterial defense against oxygen-driven Fenton reaction during reactivation.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Cryo- EM structure of the mycobacterial 70S ribosome in complex with ribosome hibernation promotion factor RafH.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Machine learning approaches to optimize small-molecule inhibitors for RNA targeting.Journal of cheminformatics · 2022Article
- Regulation of Ribosomal Protein Synthesis in Mycobacteria: The Autogenous Control ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- In Vitro Reconstitution of Yeast Translation System Capable of Synthesizing Long Polypeptide and Recapitulating Programmed Ribosome Stalling.Methods and protocols · 2021Article
- Nonredundant functions of Mycobacterium tuberculosis chaperones promote survival under stress.Molecular microbiology · 2021Article
- Crystal Structure ofFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021Article
- Article
- Development of Assay Systems for Amber Codon Decoding at the Steps of Initiation and Elongation in Mycobacteria.Journal of bacteriology · 2018Article
- Bottom-up single-molecule strategy for understanding subunit function of tetrameric β-galactosidase.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018Article
- Article
- Article
- In vitro transcription-translation using bacterial genome as a template to reconstitute intracellular profile.Nucleic acids research · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein translation is essential for all bacteria pathogens. It has also been a major focus of structural and functional studies and an important target of antibiotics. Here we report our attempts to biochemically reconstitute mycobacterial protein translation in vitro from purified components. This mycobacterial translation system consists of individually purified recombinant translation factors from Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis), purified tRNAs and ribosomes from Mycobacterium smegmatis (M. smegmatis), and an aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase (AARS) mixture from the cell-extract of M. smegmatis. We demonstrate that such mycobacterial translation system was efficient in in vitro protein synthesis, and enabled functional comparisons of translational components between the gram-positive Mycobacterium and the gram-negative E. coli. Although mycobacterial translation factors and ribosomes were highly compatible with their E. coli counterparts, M. smegmatis tRNAs were not properly charged by the E. coli AARSs to allow efficient translation of a reporter. In contrast, both E. coli and M. smegmatis tRNAs exhibited similar activity with the semi-purified M. smegmatis AARSs mixture for in vitro translation. We further demonstrated the use of both mycobacterial and E. coli translation systems as comparative in vitro assays for small-molecule antibiotics that target protein translation. While mycobacterial and E. coli translation were both inhibited at the same IC50 by the antibiotic spectinomycin, mycobacterial translation was preferentially inhibited by the antibiotic tetracycline, suggesting that there may be structural differences at the antibiotic binding sites between the ribosomes of Mycobacterium and E. coli. Our results illustrate an alternative approach for antibiotic discovery and functional studies of protein translation in mycobacteria and possibly other bacterial pathogens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.