ArticlePloS one2016
Computational Investigation of the Interplay of Substrate Positioning and Reactivity in Catechol O-Methyltransferase.
Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.
- De novo biosynthesis of alpinetin enhanced by directed evolution of 5-O-methyltransferase.Microbial cell factories · 2026Article
- Evaluation of phytochemicals from Tamarindus indica as a potential catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitor: an in-silico approach for Parkinson's disease.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Mechanistic Insights into SAM-Dependent Methyltransferases: A Review of Computational Approaches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Substrate Positioning Dynamics Involves a Non-Electrostatic Component to Mediate Catalysis.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2023Article
- Mutexa: A Computational Ecosystem for Intelligent Protein Engineering.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2023Review
- High-throughput computational investigation of protein electrostatics and cavity for SAM-dependent methyltransferases.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2023Article
- Modeling Ensembles of Enzyme Reaction Pathways with Hi-MSM Reveals the Importance of Accounting for Pathway Diversity.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2022Article
- 1-Hydroxy-2(1Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Factors That Determine the Variation of Equilibrium and Kinetic Properties of QM/MM Enzyme Simulations: QM Region, Conformation, and Boundary Condition.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2022Article
- Cheminformatic quantum mechanical enzyme model design: A catechol-O-methyltransferase case study.Biophysical journal · 2021Article
- Computational analysis of deleterious single nucleotide polymorphisms in catechol O-Methyltransferase conferring risk to post-traumatic stress disorder.Journal of psychiatric research · 2021Article
- Examining the Origin of Catalytic Power of Catechol O-Methyltransferase.ACS catalysis · 2019Article
- Revealing quantum mechanical effects in enzyme catalysis with large-scale electronic structure simulation.Reaction chemistry & engineering · 2019Article
- Large-scale QM/MM free energy simulations of enzyme catalysis reveal the influence of charge transfer.Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Catechol O-methyltransferase (COMT) is a SAM- and Mg2+-dependent methyltransferase that regulates neurotransmitters through methylation. Simulations and experiments have identified divergent catecholamine substrate orientations in the COMT active site: molecular dynamics simulations have favored a monodentate coordination of catecholate substrates to the active site Mg2+, and crystal structures instead preserve bidentate coordination along with short (2.65 Å) methyl donor-acceptor distances. We carry out longer dynamics (up to 350 ns) to quantify interconversion between bidentate and monodentate binding poses. We provide a systematic determination of the relative free energy of the monodentate and bidentate structures in order to identify whether structural differences alter the nature of the methyl transfer mechanism and source of enzymatic rate enhancement. We demonstrate that the bidentate and monodentate binding modes are close in energy but separated by a 7 kcal/mol free energy barrier. Analysis of interactions in the two binding modes reveals that the driving force for monodentate catecholate orientations in classical molecular dynamics simulations is derived from stronger electrostatic stabilization afforded by alternate Mg2+ coordination with strongly charged active site carboxylates. Mixed semi-empirical-classical (SQM/MM) substrate C-O distances (2.7 Å) for the bidentate case are in excellent agreement with COMT X-ray crystal structures, as long as charge transfer between the substrates, Mg2+, and surrounding ligands is permitted. SQM/MM free energy barriers for methyl transfer from bidentate and monodentate catecholate configurations are comparable at around 21-22 kcal/mol, in good agreement with experiment (18-19 kcal/mol). Overall, the work suggests that both binding poses are viable for methyl transfer, and accurate descriptions of charge transfer and electrostatics are needed to provide balanced relative barriers when multiple binding poses are accessible, for example in other transferases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.