Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27564282›Full record

ArticleInternational braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology

Using an abdominal phantom to teach urology residentes ultrasound-guided percutaneous needle placement.

Pauline Filippou, Anobel Odisho, Krishna Ramaswamy, Manint Usawachintachit, Weiguo Hu, Jianxing Li, Thomas Chi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Point-of-care ultrasound in urology: Design and evaluation of a feasible introductory training program for Canadian residents.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Techniques - Ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy: How we do it.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2020
    Article
  7. Simulation Training in Urology: State of the Art and Future Directions.Advances in medical education and practice · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pauline FilippouDepartment of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Anobel OdishoDepartment of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Krishna RamaswamyDepartment of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Manint UsawachintachitDepartment of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Weiguo HuBeijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Jianxing LiBeijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Thomas ChiDepartment of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo assess the effect of a hands-on ultrasound training session to teach urologic trainees ultrasound-guided percutaneous needle placement. MATERIALS AND

methodsUniversity of California, San Francisco (UCSF) urology residentes completed a time trial, placing a needle into a phantom model target under ultrasound guidance. Participants were randomized into three educational exposure groups: Group 1's time trial occurred prior to any teaching intervention, group 2's after experiencing a hands-on training module, and group 3's after exposure to both the training module and one-on-one attending feedback. Needle placement speed and accuracy as well as trainees' perceived confidence in utilizing ultrasound were measured.

resultsThe study cohort consisted of 15 resident trainees. Seven were randomized to group 1, three to group 2, and five to group 3. All residents reported minimal prior ultrasound experience. Their confidence in using ultrasound improved significantly after completing the training module with the most significant improvement seen among junior residents. Time to needle placement was fastest after receiving attending feedback (46.6sec in group 3 vs. 82.7sec in groups 1 and 2, p<0.01). Accuracy also improved with attending feedback, though the number of repositioning attempts did not differ significantly between groups.

conclusionsA hands-on training module and use of an abdominal phantom trainer increased resident confidence and skill in their use of ultrasound to guide percutaneous needle positioning. Attending feedback is critical for improving accuracy in needle guidance toward a target. Ultrasound-guided needle positioning is a teachable skill and can be applicable to multiple urologic procedures.

Indexed as

Internship and ResidencyTeachingClinical CompetenceEquipment DesignHumansImage-Guided BiopsyPhantoms, ImagingUltrasonography, InterventionalUrologyEducationPercutaneous NephrolithotomyUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID27564282
PMCPMC5006767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.