Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27564250›Full record

ReviewAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)2016

Aquatic Ecotoxicity Testing of Nanoparticles-The Quest To Disclose Nanoparticle Effects.

Lars Michael Skjolding, Sara Nørgaard Sørensen, Nanna Bloch Hartmann, Rune Hjorth, Steffen Foss Hansen, Anders Baun

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. "Green" Biomaterials: The Promising Role of Honey.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Impact of co-exposure to titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiOEnvironmental science and pollution research international · 2020
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Dispersible MoSRSC advances · 2018
    Article
  18. Cytotoxicity of silver and copper nanoparticles on rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) hepatocytes.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lars Michael SkjoldingDepartment of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Bygningstorvet B115, DK-2800, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Sara Nørgaard SørensenDepartment of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Bygningstorvet B115, DK-2800, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Nanna Bloch HartmannDepartment of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Bygningstorvet B115, DK-2800, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Rune HjorthDepartment of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Bygningstorvet B115, DK-2800, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Steffen Foss HansenDepartment of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Bygningstorvet B115, DK-2800, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Anders BaunDepartment of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Bygningstorvet B115, DK-2800, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.

Funding

European Research Council 281579
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of products on the market containing engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) has increased significantly, and concerns have been raised regarding their ecotoxicological effects. Environmental safety assessments as well as relevant and reliable ecotoxicological data are required for the safe and sustainable use of ENPs. Although the number of publications on the ecotoxicological effects and uptake of ENPs is rapidly expanding, the applicability of the reported data for hazard assessment is questionable. A major knowledge gap is whether nanoparticle effects occur when test organisms are exposed to ENPs in aquatic test systems. Filling this gap is not straightforward, because of the broad range of ENPs and the different behavior of ENPs compared to "ordinary" (dissolved) chemicals in the ecotoxicity test systems. The risk of generating false negatives, and false positives, in the currently used tests is high, and in most cases difficult to assess. This Review outlines some of the pitfalls in the aquatic toxicity testing of ENPs which may lead to misinterpretation of test results. Response types are also proposed to reveal potential nanoparticle effects in the aquatic test organisms.

Indexed as

EcotoxicologyEnvironmental MonitoringAnimalsHumansNanoparticlesWater Pollutants, ChemicalWater Pollutants, Chemicalcell toxicitynanoparticlestoxicity

Identifiers

PMID27564250
PMCPMC5132032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.