Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27563525›Full record

ArticleSpringerPlus2016

Prevalence of sensitization to food allergens and challenge proven food allergy in patients visiting allergy centers in Rawalpindi and Islamabad, Pakistan.

Muhammad Inam, Rubaba Hamid Shafique, Nabila Roohi, Muhammad Irfan, Shahid Abbas, Muhammad Ismail

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SpringerPlus, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Feast for thought: A comprehensive review of food allergy 2021-2023.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2024
    Review
  3. [Exceptional occupational allergies due to food of animal origin].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2021
    Review
  4. Challenges of managing food allergy in the developing world.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2019
    Review
  5. Red meat allergy in children and adults.Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology · 2019
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Muhammad InamPhysiology/Endocrinology Lab, Department of Zoology, University of the Punjab, Quaid-i-Azam Campus, Lahore, 54590 Pakistan.
Rubaba Hamid ShafiqueDepartment of Zoology, University of Arid Agriculture Rawalpindi (PMAS-UAAR), Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Nabila RoohiPhysiology/Endocrinology Lab, Department of Zoology, University of the Punjab, Quaid-i-Azam Campus, Lahore, 54590 Pakistan.
Muhammad IrfanDepartment of Zoology, University of Arid Agriculture Rawalpindi (PMAS-UAAR), Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Shahid AbbasAllergy Asthma and Immunology Centre, Khyber Plaza Fazal-e-Haq Road, Blue Area, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Muhammad IsmailInstitute of Biomedical and Genetic Engineering (IBGE), Islamabad, Pakistan.
Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University · PKUniversity of the Punjab · PKInstitute of Biomedical and Genetic Engineering · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we estimated the prevalence of food allergy in the adult allergic patients of Rawalpindi and Islamabad , Pakistan, based on self-report, skin prick test (SPT) and oral food challenge test (OFC). SPT was used for the estimation of sensitization to wheat, egg, milk, beef, chicken, mutton, fish, corn, lentils, rice, soya, peanut and banana. Among 689 patients, 39.19 % showed sensitivity to one or more foods, where, sensitization to wheat (156; 22.6 %) was highest, followed by egg (148; 21.48 %) and milk (138; 20.03 %). Sensitization to various proteins ranged between 15.53-15.97 %, while lentils, corn, rice, soya and peanut sensitization was 15.4, 16, 12.5, 12 and 11.5 % respectively. Only 7.1 % patients were SPT positive for banana allergen. SPT was performed in patients with self-reported food allergy (341/689) and also with no self-reported history of food allergy (348/689). SPT results were positive in 69.8 % of the self-report group, whereas, in the patients with no self-reported food allergy 9.2 % were found sensitized to one or more tested food allergens. 101 patients were recruited for OFC, 61 % of these were confirmed of food allergy. The prevalence of food allergy in the study population was 9 %. Food specific OFC results show that wheat allergy is affecting 1.6 % (95 % CI 0.9-2.84 %) of the total allergy patients, followed by egg allergy 1.31 % (95 % CI 0.70-2.47 %). Furthermore, corn allergy, rice allergy and peanut allergy were 1.02, 0.87 and 0.73 %, respectively. In conclusion, wheat allergy is the most prevalent, followed by egg, chicken, beef and fish allergy, respectively.

Indexed as

Food allergyFood sensitizationOral food challengeSkin Prick Test

Identifiers

PMID27563525
PMCPMC4980862
OpenAlexW2508922224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.