Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27563394›Full record

ArticleACS medicinal chemistry letters2016

Optimization of a Fragment-Based Screening Hit toward Potent DOT1L Inhibitors Interacting in an Induced Binding Pocket.

Clemens Scheufler, Henrik Möbitz, Christoph Gaul, Christian Ragot, Céline Be, César Fernández, Kim S Beyer, Ralph Tiedt, Frédéric Stauffer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS medicinal chemistry letters, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. New Potent DOT1L Inhibitors forACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2019
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Clemens ScheuflerNovartis Institutes for Biomedical Research , 4002 Basel, Switzerland.
Henrik MöbitzNovartis Institutes for Biomedical Research , 4002 Basel, Switzerland.
Christoph GaulNovartis Institutes for Biomedical Research , 4002 Basel, Switzerland.
Christian RagotNovartis Institutes for Biomedical Research , 4002 Basel, Switzerland.
Céline BeNovartis Institutes for Biomedical Research , 4002 Basel, Switzerland.
César FernándezNovartis Institutes for Biomedical Research , 4002 Basel, Switzerland.
Kim S BeyerNovartis Institutes for Biomedical Research , 4002 Basel, Switzerland.
Ralph TiedtNovartis Institutes for Biomedical Research , 4002 Basel, Switzerland.
Frédéric StaufferNovartis Institutes for Biomedical Research , 4002 Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mixed lineage leukemia (MLL) gene rearrangement induces leukemic transformation by ectopic recruitment of disruptor of telomeric silencing 1-like protein (DOT1L), a lysine histone methyltransferase, leading to local hypermethylation of H3K79 and misexpression of genes (including HoxA), which drive the leukemic phenotype. A weak fragment-based screening hit identified by SPR was cocrystallized with DOT1L and optimized using structure-based ligand optimization to yield compound 8 (IC50 = 14 nM). This series of inhibitors is structurally not related to cofactor SAM and is not interacting within the SAM binding pocket but induces a pocket adjacent to the SAM binding site.

Indexed as

Dot1Lfragment-based screeninhibitorlysine histone methyltransferasestructure-based design

Identifiers

PMID27563394
PMCPMC4983739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.