Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27563386›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of telerehabilitation2016

Development of the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ).

Bambang Parmanto, Allen Nelson Lewis, Kristin M Graham, Marnie H Bertolet

5 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of telerehabilitation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 5 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 339 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
339citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03742167 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Pilot Randomized Control Trial of Telemedical Support for Paramedics in Simulated Pre-hospital Pediatric Emergencies

TypeinterventionalSponsorBoston Medical CenterRan2018 to 2022Enrolled72ConditionsRespiratory Failure, Status Epilepticus, Status Asthmaticus, Cardiopulmonary ArrestArmsTelemedicine
NCT04682223 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Center for the Study of Aphasia Recovery (C-STAR): Telerehabilitation for Aphasia (TERRA)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of South CarolinaRan2021 to 2027Enrolled100ConditionsAphasia, Stroke, Stroke RehabilitationArmsSemantically-focused therapy tasks, Phonologically-focused therapy tasks
NCT05965869 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Creating Healthy Communities Through a Church-based, Community Health Worker-led Initiative

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Texas Medical Branch, GalvestonRan2023 to 2028Enrolled400ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetes Mellitus RiskArmsdiabetes program
NCT05970939 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Development, Reliability and Validity of the Telerehabilitation Usability Questionnaire- TrUQ in Neurological Diseases

TypeobservationalSponsorGazi UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled95ConditionsNeurological DiseaseArmsDevelopment of the Telerehabilitation Usability Questionnaire
NCT07716475 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of At-Home Rehabilitation Gait Training Using a Hip-assisted Wearable Robot in Stroke Patients: An Investigator-Initiated, Single-Center, Single-Arm Exploratory Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorYonsei UniversityRan2026 to 2027Enrolled8ConditionsStrokeArmship-assisted wearable robot
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

339 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. A Randomized Feasibility Study of Virtual and Face-to-Face Care Using a Novel Mobile Health Solution for Outpatient Pediatric Burns.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2025
    Trial
  11. Mobile health delivered physical activity after mild stroke or transient ischemic attack: Is it feasible and acceptable?International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2025
    Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

279 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bambang ParmantoDEPARTMENT OF HEALTH INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, SCHOOL OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATION SCIENCES, UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH, PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA, USA.
Allen Nelson LewisCOLLEGE OF HEALTH RELATED PROFESSIONS, STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK DOWNSTATE MEDICAL CENTER, BROOKLYN, NEW YORK, USA.
Kristin M GrahamDEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, SCHOOL OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATION SCIENCES, UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH, PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA, USA.
Marnie H BertoletDEPARTMENT OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, GRADUATE SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH, PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA, USA.

Funding

Harvard Prevention Research Center on Nutrition and Phy*U48DP000064 · DP · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI GORTMAKER, STEVEN L · 2004 to 2009
$4.5M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP000064
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current telehealth usability questionnaires are designed primarily for older technologies, where telehealth interaction is conducted over dedicated videoconferencing applications. However, telehealth services are increasingly conducted over computer-based systems that rely on commercial software and a user supplied computer interface. Therefore, a usability questionnaire that addresses the changes in telehealth service delivery and technology is needed. The Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ) was developed to evaluate the usability of telehealth implementation and services. This paper addresses: (1) the need for a new measure of telehealth usability, (2) the development of the TUQ, (3) intended uses for the TUQ, and (4) the reliability of the TUQ. Analyses indicate that the TUQ is a solid, robust, and versatile measure that can be used to measure the quality of the computer-based user interface and the quality of the telehealth interaction and services.

Indexed as

TelehealthTelehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ)Usability

Identifiers

PMID27563386
PMCPMC4985278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.