Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27562856›Full record

ArticleThe journal of headache and pain2016

Headache yesterday in Karnataka state, India: prevalence, impact and cost.

Timothy J Steiner, Girish N Rao, Girish B Kulkarni, Gopalkrishna Gururaj, Lars J Stovner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of headache and pain, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Timothy J SteinerDepartment of Neuroscience, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Edvard Griegs Gate, Trondheim, NO-7491, Norway. t.steiner@imperial.ac.uk.
Girish N RaoDepartment of Epidemiology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru, India.
Girish B KulkarniDepartment of Neurology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru, India.
Gopalkrishna GururajDepartment of Epidemiology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru, India.
Lars J StovnerDepartment of Neuroscience, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Edvard Griegs Gate, Trondheim, NO-7491, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Global Campaign against Headache has pioneered evaluation of the prevalence and impact of headache on the preceding day ("headache yesterday") as a new approach to the estimation of headache-attributed burden, avoiding recall error. We report its application in Karnataka State, southern India.

methodsIn a door-to-door survey, biologically unrelated adults (aged 18-65 years) were randomly sampled from urban and rural areas in and around Bengaluru and interviewed by trained researchers using a validated, structured questionnaire. Enquiry into headache applied ICHD-II diagnostic criteria and included questions about headache on the day preceding the interview (headache yesterday [HY]).

resultsThere were 2329 participants (participation proportion 92.6 %; males 1141 [49.0 %], females 1188 [51.0 %]; mean age 38.0 [±12.7] years; 1103 [47.4 %] from rural areas, 1226 [52.6 %] urban). HY was reported by 138 participants (males 33 [2.9 %], females 105 [8.8 %]): the 1-day prevalence of headache was 5.9 %. Mean duration of HY was 7.0 ± 8.5 h, so that 1.7 % of the population (5.9 % * 7.0/24), on average, had headache at any moment in time yesterday. Mean intensity on a scale of 1-3 was 2.0 [±0.8]. Lost productivity due to HY was reported by 83.3 % of participants with HY: 37.7 % able to do less than half of what they had planned and 13.0 % able to do nothing. Productivity loss at population level (being the productivity loss within the entire adult population, every single day, attributable to headache) was 3.0 %.

conclusionsThis method of enquiry, free from recall error, confirmed a very high level of headache-attributed burden in Karnataka: previous estimates based on 3-month recall may even have been too low. Until another study is done in the country, these are the best data for all India. They demonstrate need for action nationwide to mitigate this burden, and correct action will ultimately almost certainly be cost-saving.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingAdultCost of IllnessCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHeadache Disorders, PrimaryHeadache Disorders, SecondaryHealth SurveysHumansIndiaMalePrevalenceRural PopulationSurveys and QuestionnairesUrban PopulationBurdenCostGlobal Campaign against HeadacheHeadache yesterdayHealth policyIndiaMedication-overuse headacheMigraineTension-type headache

Identifiers

PMID27562856
PMCPMC4999386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.